A comparison of five surveys that identify individuals at risk for airflow obstruction and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Abstract Background The predictive characteristics of different screening surveys for the recognition of individuals at risk for airflow obstruction (AFO) have not been evaluated simultaneously in the same population. Purpose To compare five AFO/COPD screening questionnaires. Methods 383 individuals...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respiratory medicine 2016-11, Vol.120, p.1-9
Hauptverfasser: Sogbetun, Folarin, Eschenbacher, William L, Welge, Jeffrey A, Panos, Ralph J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background The predictive characteristics of different screening surveys for the recognition of individuals at risk for airflow obstruction (AFO) have not been evaluated simultaneously in the same population. Purpose To compare five AFO/COPD screening questionnaires. Methods 383 individuals completed the Veterans Airflow Obstruction Screening Questionnaire, Personal Level Screener for COPD (VAFOSQ), the 11-Q COPD Screening Questionnaire (11-Q), the COPD Population Screener (COPD-PS) and the Lung Function Questionnaire (LFQ) and performed spirometry. AFO was defined as forced expiratory volume in one second divided by the forced vital capacity (FEV1 /FVC) 
ISSN:0954-6111
1532-3064
DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2016.09.010