A framework for adapting urban forests to climate change

•We describe a framework for urban forest vulnerability assessment and adaptation.•This framework was piloted in the Chicago region from regional to local scales.•Many of the tree species found to have low vulnerability are invasive species.•Economic and organizational adaptive capacity drive munici...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science & policy 2016-12, Vol.66, p.393-402
Hauptverfasser: Brandt, Leslie, Derby Lewis, Abigail, Fahey, Robert, Scott, Lydia, Darling, Lindsay, Swanston, Chris
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•We describe a framework for urban forest vulnerability assessment and adaptation.•This framework was piloted in the Chicago region from regional to local scales.•Many of the tree species found to have low vulnerability are invasive species.•Economic and organizational adaptive capacity drive municipal forest vulnerability.•Adaptation actions vary from increasing biodiversity to planting new species. Planting urban trees and expanding urban forest canopy cover are often considered key strategies for reducing climate change impacts in urban areas. However, urban trees and forests can also be vulnerable to climate change through shifts in tree habitat suitability, changes in pests and diseases, and changes in extreme weather events. We developed a three-step framework for urban forest vulnerability assessment and adaptation that scales from regional assessment to local on-the-ground action. We piloted this framework in the Chicago region in 10 locations representing an urban-exurban gradient across a range of socioeconomic capacities. The majority of trees across a seven-county region had low to moderate vulnerability, but many of the least vulnerable species were nonnative invasive species. Urban forests in the 10 pilot locations ranged in vulnerability largely due to differences in economic and organizational adaptive capacity. Adaptation actions selected in these locations tended to focus on increased biodiversity and restoration of natural disturbance regimes. However, adaptation actions in more developed sites also included incorporating new species or cultivars. Lessons learned from the pilot area can be used to inform future efforts in other urban areas.
ISSN:1462-9011
1873-6416
DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.005