LGN Input to Simple Cells and Contrast-Invariant Orientation Tuning: An Analysis

  1 Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742;   2 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center, Moffett Field 94035-1000; and   3 Departments of Physiology and Otolaryngology, W. M. Keck Center fo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neurophysiology 2002-06, Vol.87 (6), p.2741-2752
Hauptverfasser: Troyer, Todd W, Krukowski, Anton E, Miller, Kenneth D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2752
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2741
container_title Journal of neurophysiology
container_volume 87
creator Troyer, Todd W
Krukowski, Anton E
Miller, Kenneth D
description   1 Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742;   2 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center, Moffett Field 94035-1000; and   3 Departments of Physiology and Otolaryngology, W. M. Keck Center for Integrative Neuroscience, Sloan-Swartz Center for Theoretical Neurobiology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0444 Troyer, Todd W., Anton E. Krukowski, and Kenneth D. Miller. LGN Input to Simple Cells and Contrast-Invariant Orientation Tuning: An Analysis. J. Neurophysiol. 87: 2741-2752, 2002. We develop a new analysis of the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) input to a cortical simple cell, demonstrating that this input is the sum of two terms, a linear term and a nonlinear term. In response to a drifting grating, the linear term represents the temporal modulation of input, and the nonlinear term represents the mean input. The nonlinear term, which grows with stimulus contrast, has been neglected in many previous models of simple cell response. We then analyze two scenarios by which contrast-invariance of orientation tuning may arise. In the first scenario, at larger contrasts, the nonlinear part of the LGN input, in combination with strong push-pull inhibition, counteracts the nonlinear effects of cortical spike threshold, giving the result that orientation tuning scales with contrast. In the second scenario, at low contrasts, the nonlinear component of LGN input is negligible, and noise smooths the nonlinearity of spike threshold so that the input-output function approximates a power-law function. These scenarios can be combined to yield contrast-invariant tuning over the full range of stimulus contrast. The model clarifies the contribution of LGN nonlinearities to the orientation tuning of simple cells and demonstrates how these nonlinearities may impact different models of contrast-invariant tuning.
doi_str_mv 10.1152/jn.2002.87.6.2741
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_highw</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18460808</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18460808</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-ed88852ab32f76e99fce40de233ff48fee7044906def23036b33eb081d2492b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF9r2zAUxcVYWdN2H2AvQ0_bk72rP7bkvZWwdoGwFpo9CzmWEgVH9iS5W759FRLWpzG4ILg653DuD6EPBEpCKvpl50sKQEspyrqkgpM3aJb3tCBVI9-iWf6jBQMhLtFVjDsAEBXQd-iSUGCCiHqGHpf3P_DCj1PCacBPbj_2Bs9N30esfYfng09Bx1Qs_LMOTvuEH4IzPunkBo9Xk3d-8xXf-jy6P0QXb9CF1X0078_vNfp59201_14sH-4X89tlsebAU2E6KWVFdcuoFbVpGrs2HDpDGbOWS2uMAM4bqDtjKQNWt4yZFiTpKG9oC-wafTrljmH4NZmY1N7FdS6uvRmmqPJ5tK5E818hkbwGCTILyUm4DkOMwVg1BrfX4aAIqCNvtfPqyFtJoWp15J09H8_hU7s33avjDDgL2EmwdZvtbxeMGrcZ09APm4O6m_p-Zf6kHPw3Uo2dza7P_3blFq8FXgC0-5sd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18460808</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>LGN Input to Simple Cells and Contrast-Invariant Orientation Tuning: An Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Physiological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Troyer, Todd W ; Krukowski, Anton E ; Miller, Kenneth D</creator><creatorcontrib>Troyer, Todd W ; Krukowski, Anton E ; Miller, Kenneth D</creatorcontrib><description>  1 Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742;   2 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center, Moffett Field 94035-1000; and   3 Departments of Physiology and Otolaryngology, W. M. Keck Center for Integrative Neuroscience, Sloan-Swartz Center for Theoretical Neurobiology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0444 Troyer, Todd W., Anton E. Krukowski, and Kenneth D. Miller. LGN Input to Simple Cells and Contrast-Invariant Orientation Tuning: An Analysis. J. Neurophysiol. 87: 2741-2752, 2002. We develop a new analysis of the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) input to a cortical simple cell, demonstrating that this input is the sum of two terms, a linear term and a nonlinear term. In response to a drifting grating, the linear term represents the temporal modulation of input, and the nonlinear term represents the mean input. The nonlinear term, which grows with stimulus contrast, has been neglected in many previous models of simple cell response. We then analyze two scenarios by which contrast-invariance of orientation tuning may arise. In the first scenario, at larger contrasts, the nonlinear part of the LGN input, in combination with strong push-pull inhibition, counteracts the nonlinear effects of cortical spike threshold, giving the result that orientation tuning scales with contrast. In the second scenario, at low contrasts, the nonlinear component of LGN input is negligible, and noise smooths the nonlinearity of spike threshold so that the input-output function approximates a power-law function. These scenarios can be combined to yield contrast-invariant tuning over the full range of stimulus contrast. The model clarifies the contribution of LGN nonlinearities to the orientation tuning of simple cells and demonstrates how these nonlinearities may impact different models of contrast-invariant tuning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3077</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-1598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1152/jn.2002.87.6.2741</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12037176</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Am Phys Soc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Contrast Sensitivity - physiology ; Geniculate Bodies - cytology ; Geniculate Bodies - physiology ; Models, Neurological ; Neural Inhibition - physiology ; Orientation - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurophysiology, 2002-06, Vol.87 (6), p.2741-2752</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-ed88852ab32f76e99fce40de233ff48fee7044906def23036b33eb081d2492b03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-ed88852ab32f76e99fce40de233ff48fee7044906def23036b33eb081d2492b03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3030,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12037176$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Troyer, Todd W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krukowski, Anton E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Kenneth D</creatorcontrib><title>LGN Input to Simple Cells and Contrast-Invariant Orientation Tuning: An Analysis</title><title>Journal of neurophysiology</title><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><description>  1 Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742;   2 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center, Moffett Field 94035-1000; and   3 Departments of Physiology and Otolaryngology, W. M. Keck Center for Integrative Neuroscience, Sloan-Swartz Center for Theoretical Neurobiology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0444 Troyer, Todd W., Anton E. Krukowski, and Kenneth D. Miller. LGN Input to Simple Cells and Contrast-Invariant Orientation Tuning: An Analysis. J. Neurophysiol. 87: 2741-2752, 2002. We develop a new analysis of the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) input to a cortical simple cell, demonstrating that this input is the sum of two terms, a linear term and a nonlinear term. In response to a drifting grating, the linear term represents the temporal modulation of input, and the nonlinear term represents the mean input. The nonlinear term, which grows with stimulus contrast, has been neglected in many previous models of simple cell response. We then analyze two scenarios by which contrast-invariance of orientation tuning may arise. In the first scenario, at larger contrasts, the nonlinear part of the LGN input, in combination with strong push-pull inhibition, counteracts the nonlinear effects of cortical spike threshold, giving the result that orientation tuning scales with contrast. In the second scenario, at low contrasts, the nonlinear component of LGN input is negligible, and noise smooths the nonlinearity of spike threshold so that the input-output function approximates a power-law function. These scenarios can be combined to yield contrast-invariant tuning over the full range of stimulus contrast. The model clarifies the contribution of LGN nonlinearities to the orientation tuning of simple cells and demonstrates how these nonlinearities may impact different models of contrast-invariant tuning.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Contrast Sensitivity - physiology</subject><subject>Geniculate Bodies - cytology</subject><subject>Geniculate Bodies - physiology</subject><subject>Models, Neurological</subject><subject>Neural Inhibition - physiology</subject><subject>Orientation - physiology</subject><issn>0022-3077</issn><issn>1522-1598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF9r2zAUxcVYWdN2H2AvQ0_bk72rP7bkvZWwdoGwFpo9CzmWEgVH9iS5W759FRLWpzG4ILg653DuD6EPBEpCKvpl50sKQEspyrqkgpM3aJb3tCBVI9-iWf6jBQMhLtFVjDsAEBXQd-iSUGCCiHqGHpf3P_DCj1PCacBPbj_2Bs9N30esfYfng09Bx1Qs_LMOTvuEH4IzPunkBo9Xk3d-8xXf-jy6P0QXb9CF1X0078_vNfp59201_14sH-4X89tlsebAU2E6KWVFdcuoFbVpGrs2HDpDGbOWS2uMAM4bqDtjKQNWt4yZFiTpKG9oC-wafTrljmH4NZmY1N7FdS6uvRmmqPJ5tK5E818hkbwGCTILyUm4DkOMwVg1BrfX4aAIqCNvtfPqyFtJoWp15J09H8_hU7s33avjDDgL2EmwdZvtbxeMGrcZ09APm4O6m_p-Zf6kHPw3Uo2dza7P_3blFq8FXgC0-5sd</recordid><startdate>20020601</startdate><enddate>20020601</enddate><creator>Troyer, Todd W</creator><creator>Krukowski, Anton E</creator><creator>Miller, Kenneth D</creator><general>Am Phys Soc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020601</creationdate><title>LGN Input to Simple Cells and Contrast-Invariant Orientation Tuning: An Analysis</title><author>Troyer, Todd W ; Krukowski, Anton E ; Miller, Kenneth D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-ed88852ab32f76e99fce40de233ff48fee7044906def23036b33eb081d2492b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Contrast Sensitivity - physiology</topic><topic>Geniculate Bodies - cytology</topic><topic>Geniculate Bodies - physiology</topic><topic>Models, Neurological</topic><topic>Neural Inhibition - physiology</topic><topic>Orientation - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Troyer, Todd W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krukowski, Anton E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Kenneth D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Troyer, Todd W</au><au>Krukowski, Anton E</au><au>Miller, Kenneth D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>LGN Input to Simple Cells and Contrast-Invariant Orientation Tuning: An Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><date>2002-06-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2741</spage><epage>2752</epage><pages>2741-2752</pages><issn>0022-3077</issn><eissn>1522-1598</eissn><abstract>  1 Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742;   2 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center, Moffett Field 94035-1000; and   3 Departments of Physiology and Otolaryngology, W. M. Keck Center for Integrative Neuroscience, Sloan-Swartz Center for Theoretical Neurobiology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0444 Troyer, Todd W., Anton E. Krukowski, and Kenneth D. Miller. LGN Input to Simple Cells and Contrast-Invariant Orientation Tuning: An Analysis. J. Neurophysiol. 87: 2741-2752, 2002. We develop a new analysis of the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) input to a cortical simple cell, demonstrating that this input is the sum of two terms, a linear term and a nonlinear term. In response to a drifting grating, the linear term represents the temporal modulation of input, and the nonlinear term represents the mean input. The nonlinear term, which grows with stimulus contrast, has been neglected in many previous models of simple cell response. We then analyze two scenarios by which contrast-invariance of orientation tuning may arise. In the first scenario, at larger contrasts, the nonlinear part of the LGN input, in combination with strong push-pull inhibition, counteracts the nonlinear effects of cortical spike threshold, giving the result that orientation tuning scales with contrast. In the second scenario, at low contrasts, the nonlinear component of LGN input is negligible, and noise smooths the nonlinearity of spike threshold so that the input-output function approximates a power-law function. These scenarios can be combined to yield contrast-invariant tuning over the full range of stimulus contrast. The model clarifies the contribution of LGN nonlinearities to the orientation tuning of simple cells and demonstrates how these nonlinearities may impact different models of contrast-invariant tuning.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Am Phys Soc</pub><pmid>12037176</pmid><doi>10.1152/jn.2002.87.6.2741</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3077
ispartof Journal of neurophysiology, 2002-06, Vol.87 (6), p.2741-2752
issn 0022-3077
1522-1598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18460808
source MEDLINE; American Physiological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Animals
Contrast Sensitivity - physiology
Geniculate Bodies - cytology
Geniculate Bodies - physiology
Models, Neurological
Neural Inhibition - physiology
Orientation - physiology
title LGN Input to Simple Cells and Contrast-Invariant Orientation Tuning: An Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T04%3A49%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_highw&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=LGN%20Input%20to%20Simple%20Cells%20and%20Contrast-Invariant%20Orientation%20Tuning:%20An%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurophysiology&rft.au=Troyer,%20Todd%20W&rft.date=2002-06-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2741&rft.epage=2752&rft.pages=2741-2752&rft.issn=0022-3077&rft.eissn=1522-1598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152/jn.2002.87.6.2741&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_highw%3E18460808%3C/proquest_highw%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18460808&rft_id=info:pmid/12037176&rfr_iscdi=true