The available water holding capacity of soils under pasture

•Ignoring subsoil uptake underestimates available holding water capacity.•Pasture can dry the top 300mm of soil to less than the −1.5MPa water content.•Thus annual drainage/runoff can be overestimated by 100mm or more.•This matters when estimating optimum dam size and nitrogen leaching. The concept...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agricultural water management 2016-11, Vol.177, p.165-171
Hauptverfasser: Horne, D.J., Scotter, D.R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Ignoring subsoil uptake underestimates available holding water capacity.•Pasture can dry the top 300mm of soil to less than the −1.5MPa water content.•Thus annual drainage/runoff can be overestimated by 100mm or more.•This matters when estimating optimum dam size and nitrogen leaching. The concept of available water holding capacity (AWHC) is important to many aspects of soil water management, particularly those involving a soil water balance calculation. In New Zealand AWHC estimates are commonly based directly or indirectly on laboratory measured pressure plate data. Such retentivity based values for AWHC are relatively similar across a range of soil types. Less often, AWHC values have been measured under rye grass/white clover pasture in the field. We critically discuss an important earlier New Zealand study. It noted that field-measured values are commonly about twice the laboratory-based estimates. We conclude that variable rooting depth, due to the presence or absence of compacted soil at depth and/or variable pasture vigour or species composition, usually has a greater effect on the AWHC than does the soil properties in the top 760mm depth. Finally, it is claimed that this uncertainty around the exact size of AWHC need not undermine its utility. The one exemption to this assurance is where reliable predictions of drainage (and leaching) below the root zone are required: in this case there is the likelihood that use of the often quoted values for AWHC in the water balance will result in a significant overestimation of drainage (and leaching).
ISSN:0378-3774
1873-2283
DOI:10.1016/j.agwat.2016.07.012