Two years follow up of 270 patients treated by transvaginal mesh for anterior and/or apical prolapse

Abstarct Objective The aim of this study was to assess the 1 and 2 years outcomes of transvaginal single incision mesh surgery (SIMS) for anterior pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Material and methods This was a prospective study including all patients from November 2008 to December 2012 who underwent S...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 2017-01, Vol.208, p.16-22
Hauptverfasser: Hugele, Florence, Panel, Laure, Farache, Camille, Kashef, Amgad, Cornille, Arnaud, Courtieu, Christophe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstarct Objective The aim of this study was to assess the 1 and 2 years outcomes of transvaginal single incision mesh surgery (SIMS) for anterior pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Material and methods This was a prospective study including all patients from November 2008 to December 2012 who underwent SIMS for symptomatic anterior prolapse stage ≥2, according to the POP Quantification (POP-Q). Symptoms and quality of life were assessed using validated questionnaires: Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), Pelvic Floor Impact questionnaire (PFIQ-7), and Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). The main outcome was subjective success (question 3 of PFDI-20 score = 0). Safety, anatomic and functional outcomes were used as the secondary outcomes. Results A total of 270 patients were included in the study. Subjective success rate was 95,4% and 92,2% at 1 and 2 years. Objective success rate was 65,9%and 60,5% at 1 and 2 years. At 1 year, composite failure (subjective + objective) occurred for 11 patients (4,6%), 5 patients with direct recurrence and 6 with indirect recurrence. At 2 years, composite failure was reported for 14 patients (6,4%): 6 direct recurrences and 8 indirect recurrences. Re-treatment was performed in one case (0,4%). One case (0,4%) of asymptomatic mesh exposure occurred. The reoperation rate for mesh-related complications was 3%. We reported a de novo dyspareunia rate of 8,4%, 5,3% considered as mesh-related. A significant improvement was noted for symptoms and quality of life. Conclusion POP repair using SIMS is a safe and efficient treatment of anterior compartment prolapse in the medium term with a low rate of mesh-related complications. Longer-term follow-up is ongoing.
ISSN:0301-2115
1872-7654
DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.10.015