The dose–response of salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract Purpose/objectives To date neither the optimal radiotherapy dose nor the existence of a dose–response has been established for salvage RT (SRT). Materials/methods A systematic review from 1996 to 2015 and meta-analysis was performed to identify the pathologic, clinical and treatment factors...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiotherapy and oncology 2016-11, Vol.121 (2), p.199-203 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Purpose/objectives To date neither the optimal radiotherapy dose nor the existence of a dose–response has been established for salvage RT (SRT). Materials/methods A systematic review from 1996 to 2015 and meta-analysis was performed to identify the pathologic, clinical and treatment factors associated with relapse-free survival (RFS) after SRT (uniformly defined as a PSA > 0.2 ng/mL or rising above post-SRT nadir). A sigmoidal dose–response curve was objectively fitted and a non-parametric statistical test used to determine significance. Results 71 studies (10,034 patients) satisfied the meta-analysis criteria. SRT dose ( p = 0.0001), PSA prior to SRT ( p = 0.0009), ECE+ ( p = 0.039) and SV+ ( p = 0.046) had significant associations with RFS. Statistical analyses confirmed the independence of SRT dose–response. Omission of series with ADT did not alter results. Dose–response is well fit by a sigmoidal curve ( p = 0.0001) with a TCD50 of 65.8 Gy, with a dose of 70 Gy achieving 58.4% RFS vs. 38.5% for 60 Gy. A 2.0% [95% CI 1.1–3.2] improvement in RFS is achieved for each Gy. The SRT dose–response remarkably parallels that for definitive RT of localized disease. Conclusions This study provides level 2a evidence for dose-escalated SRT > 70 Gy. The presence of an SRT dose–response for microscopic disease supports the hypothesis that prostate cancer is inherently radio-resistant. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-8140 1879-0887 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.10.026 |