De-escalation of empiric antibiotics in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock: A meta-analysis

Abstract Objective To evaluate the impact of de-escalation therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with severe sepsis and/or septic shock. Methods We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CENTRAL on The Cochrane Library. The search terms used were “sepsis,”...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart & lung 2016-09, Vol.45 (5), p.454-459
Hauptverfasser: Guo, Ying, MD, Gao, Wei, MD, Yang, Hongxia, MD, Ma, Cheng'en, MD, Sui, Shujian, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objective To evaluate the impact of de-escalation therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with severe sepsis and/or septic shock. Methods We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CENTRAL on The Cochrane Library. The search terms used were “sepsis,” “septic shock” and “de-escalation.” The relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was used to evaluate the impact of de-escalation therapy on clinical outcomes. Results Nine individual studies (1873 patients) were included. Mortality trended lower in the de-escalation group as compared with the continuation of broad-spectrum antibiotics group. However, the results were not statistically significant (RR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.54–1.03). Conclusion Antibiotic de-escalation therapy has no detrimental impact on mortality in patients with severe sepsis and/or septic shock, as compared to the continuation of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Since de-escalation affords an opportunity to limit overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics, it should be considered as an option in clinical practice.
ISSN:0147-9563
1527-3288
DOI:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2016.06.001