A comparison of PCR assays for beak and feather disease virus and high resolution melt (HRM) curve analysis of replicase associated protein and capsid genes
•A PCR HRM assay for characterizing beak and feather disease virus was developed.•The assay had high sensitivity (99.9%) in comparison to existing methods.•Analyses highlighted differences in sensitivity based on target gene fragment size. Beak and feather disease virus (BFDV) threatens a wide range...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of virological methods 2016-11, Vol.237, p.47-57 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •A PCR HRM assay for characterizing beak and feather disease virus was developed.•The assay had high sensitivity (99.9%) in comparison to existing methods.•Analyses highlighted differences in sensitivity based on target gene fragment size.
Beak and feather disease virus (BFDV) threatens a wide range of endangered psittacine birds worldwide. In this study, we assessed a novel PCR assay and genetic screening method using high-resolution melt (HRM) curve analysis for BFDV targeting the capsid (Cap) gene (HRM-Cap) alongside conventional PCR detection as well as a PCR method that targets a much smaller fragment of the virus genome in the replicase initiator protein (Rep) gene (HRM-Rep). Limits of detection, sensitivity, specificity and discriminatory power for differentiating BFDV sequences were compared. HRM-Cap had a high positive predictive value and could readily differentiate between a reference genotype and 17 other diverse BFDV genomes with more discriminatory power (genotype confidence percentage) than HRM-Rep. Melt curve profiles generated by HRM-Cap correlated with unique DNA sequence profiles for each individual test genome. The limit of detection of HRM-Cap was lower (2×10−5ng/reaction or 48 viral copies) than that for both HRM-Rep and conventional BFDV PCR which had similar sensitivity (2×10−6ng or 13 viral copies/reaction). However, when used in a diagnostic setting with 348 clinical samples there was strong agreement between HRM-Cap and conventional PCR (kappa=0.87, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0166-0934 1879-0984 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jviromet.2016.08.015 |