Do spinal cord-injured individuals with stronger sense of coherence use different psychological defense styles?

Objectives: Although the importance of sense of coherence (SOC) and psychological defense mechanisms (PDMs) in the process of coping has been demonstrated, it has not yet been clarified whether individuals with stronger SOC use specific PDMs. Study design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Iran. Methods: De...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Spinal cord 2016-10, Vol.54 (10), p.843-848
Hauptverfasser: Shakeri, J, Yazdanshenas Ghazwin, M, Rakizadeh, E, Moshari, A, Sharbatdaralaei, H, Latifi, S, Tavakoli, S A H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives: Although the importance of sense of coherence (SOC) and psychological defense mechanisms (PDMs) in the process of coping has been demonstrated, it has not yet been clarified whether individuals with stronger SOC use specific PDMs. Study design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Iran. Methods: Demographic and injury-related variables including injury level, time since injury, American Spinal Cord Association (ASIA) Scale and Spinal cord independence measure-III were collected among individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). SOC was assessed by the Short-form Sense of Coherence Scale. PDMs were identified using 40-version of the Defense Style Questionnaire. Results: Neurotic defense style was the most commonly used style especially. The overall most commonly used PDM was ‘rationalization’, which was used by 95%. Individuals with stronger SOC used more mature style ( P =0.001, r =0.52), particularly ‘humor’ and ‘suppression’ mechanisms ( P
ISSN:1362-4393
1476-5624
DOI:10.1038/sc.2015.213