Effect of delayed resection after initial surveillance and tumor growth rate on final surgical pathology in patients with small renal masses (SRMs)
Abstract Objective To understand potential harms associated with delaying resection of small renal masses (SRMs) in patients ultimately treated, and whether these patients have factors associated with adverse pathology. Methods Patients with SRMs (≤4 cm) who underwent surgical resection at our insti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Urologic oncology 2016-11, Vol.34 (11), p.486.e9-486.e15 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Objective To understand potential harms associated with delaying resection of small renal masses (SRMs) in patients ultimately treated, and whether these patients have factors associated with adverse pathology. Methods Patients with SRMs (≤4 cm) who underwent surgical resection at our institution (2009–2015) were classified as undergoing early resection or initial surveillance with delayed resection (defined by a time from presentation to intervention of at least 6 mo). Demographic and clinical variables were compared among groups. Using multivariable logistic regression, we examined the association between delayed resection and adverse pathology (Fuhrman grade 3−4, papillary type 2, sarcomatoid histology, angiomyolipoma with epithelioid features, or stage≥pT3). For patients who underwent delayed intervention, we used similar methods to examine the association between SRM growth rate and adverse pathology. Results Overall, 401 (81%) and 94 (19%) patients underwent early and delayed resection, respectively. Median time to resection was 84 days (interquartile range: 59−121) and 386 days (interquartile range: 272−702) ( P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1078-1439 1873-2496 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.05.032 |