In vitro inhibition of Eimeria tenella sporozoite invasion into host cells by probiotics

•The probiotics Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. animalis # 503, Enterococcus faecium # 497, E. faecium # 589, Lactobacillus reuteri # 514, L. salivarius subsp. salivarius # 505, and Bacillus subtilis # 588 inhibited Eimeria tenella invasion into MDBK cells up to 80%.•The strongest effect was shown b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary parasitology 2016-10, Vol.229, p.93-98
Hauptverfasser: Hessenberger, S., Schatzmayr, G., Teichmann, K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•The probiotics Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. animalis # 503, Enterococcus faecium # 497, E. faecium # 589, Lactobacillus reuteri # 514, L. salivarius subsp. salivarius # 505, and Bacillus subtilis # 588 inhibited Eimeria tenella invasion into MDBK cells up to 80%.•The strongest effect was shown by E. faecium # 589. The effect was strain-specific for E. faecium strains.•Dead Enterococcus faecium # 589 and Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salivarius # 505 inhibited parasite invasion in an overnight approach. The aim was to study the effects of probiotics isolated from the intestinal tract of livestock animals on Eimeria tenella invasion into Madin-Darby bovine kidney (MDBK) cells in vitro. E. tenella sporozoites were purified and labeled with 5(6)-carboxyfluorescein diacetate N-succinimidyl ester before seeding on cell cultures, and invasion was evaluated by fluorescence microscopy. Two protocols (A and B) were used. In protocol A, Enterococcus faecium # 589 or Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salivarius # 505 were added together with sporozoites to MDBK cell cultures and invasion was evaluated after incubation for approximately 20h. Viable, dead, or spent culture supernatants of probiotics were tested. In protocol B, viable probiotics were incubated with MDBK cells for one hour before sporozoites were added and invasion was evaluated after two more hours of incubation. Parasite invasion of viable, dead, or spent culture supernatant of E. faecium # 589 was assessed. Using protocol A, it was shown that parasite invasion was inhibited by viable (80%) or dead (75%) E. faecium # 589. While inhibition by viable L. salivarius subsp. salivarius # 505 was not valid at the highest concentration and not significant at the other test concentrations, dead cells inhibited parasite invasion up to 45%. Spent culture supernatants of both probiotics had no influence on parasite invasion. Using protocol B, it was shown that viable Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. animalis # 503, E. faecium # 497, E. faecium # 589, L. reuteri # 514, L. salivarius subsp. salivarius # 505, and Bacillus subtilis # 588 inhibited parasite invasion into MDBK cells up to 80%. Anticoccidial activity was strain-specific for E. faecium strains, and the strongest effect was shown by E. faecium # 589. Anticoccidial effects of some of the tested probiotics have already been shown in vivo, which makes them candidates to prevent coccidiosis. These findings have now been confirmed in vitro. The used parasite
ISSN:0304-4017
1873-2550
DOI:10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.10.001