Butanol production from lignocellulose by simultaneous fermentation, saccharification, and pervaporation or vacuum evaporation

•CO2 compression was the most important item in energetic evaluation.•Detoxification by pervaporation or vacuum evaporation was inefficient.•A kinetic model with furans and phenolics effect was proposed. Techno-economic study of acetone, butanol and ethanol (ABE) fermentation from lignocellulose was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioresource technology 2016-10, Vol.218, p.174-182
Hauptverfasser: Díaz, Víctor Hugo Grisales, Tost, Gerard Olivar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•CO2 compression was the most important item in energetic evaluation.•Detoxification by pervaporation or vacuum evaporation was inefficient.•A kinetic model with furans and phenolics effect was proposed. Techno-economic study of acetone, butanol and ethanol (ABE) fermentation from lignocellulose was performed. Simultaneous saccharification, fermentation and vacuum evaporation (SFS-V) or pervaporation (SFS-P) were proposed. A kinetic model of metabolic pathways for ABE fermentation with the effect of phenolics and furans in the growth was proposed based on published laboratory results. The processes were optimized in Matlab®. The end ABE purification was carried out by heat-integrated distillation. The objective function of the minimization was the total annualized cost (TAC). Fuel consumption of SFS-P using poly[1-(trimethylsilyl)-1-propyne] membrane was between 13.8 and 19.6% lower than SFS-V. Recovery of furans and phenolics for the hybrid reactors was difficult for its high boiling point. TAC of SFS-P was increased 1.9 times with supplementation of phenolics and furans to 3g/l each one for its high toxicity. Therefore, an additional detoxification method or an efficient pretreatment process will be necessary.
ISSN:0960-8524
1873-2976
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.06.091