Comparison of systemic reactions in rush, cluster, and standard-build aeroallergen immunotherapy

Abstract Background Given the choice of standard, cluster, and rush build-up for aeroallergen immunotherapy, standard-build immunotherapy has generally been preferred because of a perceived high rate of systemic reactions (SRs) associated with cluster and rush immunotherapy. Objective To characteriz...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of allergy, asthma, & immunology asthma, & immunology, 2016-11, Vol.117 (5), p.542-545
Hauptverfasser: Winslow, Andrew W., MD, Turbyville, Joseph C., MD, Sublett, J. Wesley, MD, Sublett, James L., MD, Pollard, Stephen J., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Given the choice of standard, cluster, and rush build-up for aeroallergen immunotherapy, standard-build immunotherapy has generally been preferred because of a perceived high rate of systemic reactions (SRs) associated with cluster and rush immunotherapy. Objective To characterize the incidence of SRs during standard, cluster, and rush build-up immunotherapy in an allergy practice during a 5-year period. Methods A retrospective review was conducted among patients receiving standard-build, 8- to 10-step cluster, or 2-day rush immunotherapy from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2014, at Family Allergy & Asthma clinics in Louisville, Kentucky. Investigators excluded reactions that occurred during skin prick testing, venom immunotherapy, and not-true SRs, and identified the build-up method, age, sex, date of reaction, vial concentration, and presence of asthma. Per-shot and per-patient incidence of SRs was computed from these data. Results During our review period, 2,549,643 injections were administered to 11,982 patients. Per-shot incidence of SR was 0.01%, 0.06%, and 0.33% for standard, cluster, and rush immunotherapy, respectively; per-patient incidence of SR was 2.84%, 2.52%, and 11.86% for standard, cluster, and rush immunotherapy, respectively. A total of 42% of SRs were grade 1, 43% were grade 2, 12% were grade 3, and 3% were grade 4. No fatalities were reported. A total of 70% of total SRs, 75% of cluster SR, and 55% of rush SR occurred in females, with an emergent peak in SR from May to October. Conclusion Compared with previously published rates, we observed a decrease in the incidence of SR for standard, cluster, and rush immunotherapy, with peak seasonality from May to October and a female predominance.
ISSN:1081-1206
1534-4436
DOI:10.1016/j.anai.2016.09.005