The static bubble point pressure model for cryogenic screen channel liquid acquisition devices
•Empirical model developed for bubble point pressure for cryogenic liquid acquisition devices.•5224 room temperature and cryogenic bubble point data points gathered.•Trends in cryogenic bubble point pressure are identified and examined.•Screen type, liquid temperature and pressure, and pressurant ga...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of heat and mass transfer 2016-10, Vol.101, p.502-516 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Empirical model developed for bubble point pressure for cryogenic liquid acquisition devices.•5224 room temperature and cryogenic bubble point data points gathered.•Trends in cryogenic bubble point pressure are identified and examined.•Screen type, liquid temperature and pressure, and pressurant gas type and temperature are primary factors.•Mean absolute error between data and new model is 2.8%.
Inside a propellant tank in microgravity, surface tension forces dominate, and porous screen channel liquid acquisition devices (LADs) are required to separate fluid phases and ensure vapor free liquid flow out of the tank to the transfer line en route to an in-space engine. Maximum bubble point pressure (based on Adamson and Gast, 1997), or the breakdown point, is the primary performance parameter characterizing the LAD. This paper presents a robust empirical equation based off of 45years of experimental data which models the bubble point pressure in both room temperature as well as cryogenic liquids. The seven parameters which affect the bubble point pressure include the surface tension (liquid type), contact angle, screen pore diameter, liquid temperature, degree of subcooling, and pressurant gas type and temperature. Decreasing temperature increases bubble point pressure due to increased surface tension and screen pore shrinkage. Higher bubble points are always obtained using a non-condensable pressurant gas over a condensable gas. Pressurizing and subcooling the interface adds margin in bubble point whereas elevating the temperature of the pressurant gas acts as a degradation factor. The mean absolute error between 5224 data points and new model is 2.75% of the experimental data across the full range of thermodynamic conditions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0017-9310 1879-2189 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.05.024 |