Conservation of scattered energy and asymmetry factor in the new Rotationally Symmetric Spherical Discretisation scheme

•New RSSD discretisation method tested for conservation of scattered energy and g.•RSSD energy conservation error strong function of phase function angular resolution.•RSSD energy error can be made negligible by input phase function resolution control.•Error in RSSD asymmetry factor g can be limited...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of heat and mass transfer 2016-10, Vol.101, p.205-225
Hauptverfasser: Roos, T.H., Harms, T.M., du Toit, C.G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•New RSSD discretisation method tested for conservation of scattered energy and g.•RSSD energy conservation error strong function of phase function angular resolution.•RSSD energy error can be made negligible by input phase function resolution control.•Error in RSSD asymmetry factor g can be limited to −2.7% to +1%.•RSSD boundaries for S4, S6, S8 and S10 sets are tabulated in the paper. A Rotationally Symmetric Spherical Discretisation (RSSD) technique has recently been developed for the discretisation of scattering phase functions in the Discrete Ordinates Method (DOM) in a consistent and rational manner. RSSD has inherent energy conservation, is suitable for any quadrature scheme used, minimising run-time matrix calculation, and to date has been used for the S4, S6 and S8 ordinate sets. In this follow-up paper, the RSSD boundary intervals for the four weightings of the S10 ordinate set are presented. The effect of asymmetry factor g and angular resolution of the discrete input scattering phase function distribution “grid” on final RSSD errors (in scattered energy conservation and calculated asymmetry factor) is explored, making use of the Henyey–Greenstein (HG) family of distributions. It is shown that the RSSD scattered energy error ξeRSSD is a strong function of the grid resolution, indicating that ξeRSSD can be controlled down to user-required levels by judicious choice of grid resolution and by local grid refinement in regions of steep gradients and peaks in the scattering phase function distribution (in this paper error levels as low as 0.002% have been achieved). RSSD asymmetry factor error ξgRSSD behaves differently to ξeRSSD, however, displaying a strong grid resolution dependence in a “grid sensitivity zone” of combinations of coarse grid resolution and high values of prescribed g (for the HG family of scattering phase functions, above g values of 0.9, 0.95 and 0.98 for grid angular resolutions of 1°, 0.5° and 0.25° respectively). Outside of the “grid sensitivity zone” g error is insensitive to grid resolution and achieves maximum (positive and negative) values of between −2.7% and 1% between prescribed g values of 0.7 and 0.9. This band decreases to a range from −1% to 1% for the S4, S6 and S10 ordinate sets. The grid resolution conclusions are supported by examining RSSD discretisation for two real scattering phase function distributions: for a diffusely reflecting large sphere with an asymmetry factor of −0.4444, grid angular resolutions of 2
ISSN:0017-9310
1879-2189
DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.03.005