Compressional wave dispersion due to rock matrix stiffening by clay squirt flow
The standard Biot‐Gassmann theory of poroelasticity fails to explain strong compressional wave velocity dispersion experimentally observed in 12 tight siltstone with clay‐filled pores. In order to analyze and understand the results, we developed a new double‐porosity model of clay squirt flow where...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geophysical research letters 2016-06, Vol.43 (12), p.6186-6195 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The standard Biot‐Gassmann theory of poroelasticity fails to explain strong compressional wave velocity dispersion experimentally observed in 12 tight siltstone with clay‐filled pores. In order to analyze and understand the results, we developed a new double‐porosity model of clay squirt flow where wave‐induced local fluid flow occurs between the micropores in clay aggregates and intergranular macropores. The model is validated based on the combined study of ultrasonic experiments on specimens at different saturation conditions and theoretical predictions. The presence of a sub‐pore‐scale structure of clay micropores contained in intergranular macropores, where the fluid does not have enough time to achieve mechanical equilibrium at ultrasonic frequencies and thus stiffens the rock matrix, provides a suitable explanation of the experimental data. Moreover, the model provides a new bound for estimating the compressional wave velocity of tight rocks saturated with two immiscible liquids. The theoretical predictions indicate that the velocity variation between gas‐ and liquid‐saturated specimens is predominantly induced by the clay squirt stiffening effect on the rock matrix and not by fluid substitution. The effect contributes more than 90% to the variation in the porosity range of 0–5%. Thus, clay squirt flow dominates the relationships between compressional wave velocity and pore fluid in tight rocks.
Key Points
Clay squirt stiffening effect dominates velocity variation between drained and undrained rocks
Squirt flow between clay micropores and matrix macropores induces wave dispersion in siltstone
Clay squirt model helps predict wave velocity in tight rock saturated with immiscible liquids |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0094-8276 1944-8007 |
DOI: | 10.1002/2016GL069312 |