In vitro initial stability of a stemless humeral implant

Abstract Background Stemless humeral prostheses have been recently introduced. We measured for the first time their in vitro primary stability and analyzed the influence of three clinically important parameters (bone quality, implant size and post-operative loading) on micromotion. We also assessed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical biomechanics (Bristol) 2016-02, Vol.32, p.113-117
Hauptverfasser: Favre, Philippe, Seebeck, Jörn, Thistlethwaite, Paul A.E, Obrist, Marc, Steffens, Jason G, Hopkins, Andrew R, Hulme, Paul A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Stemless humeral prostheses have been recently introduced. We measured for the first time their in vitro primary stability and analyzed the influence of three clinically important parameters (bone quality, implant size and post-operative loading) on micromotion. We also assessed if displacement sensors are appropriate to measure implant micromotion. Methods A stemless humeral implant (Sidus® Stem-Free Shoulder, Zimmer GmbH, Winterthur, Switzerland) was implanted in 18 cadaveric humeri. Three-dimensional motion of the implant was measured under dynamic loading at three load magnitudes with displacement sensors. Additionally, the relative motion at the bone–implant interface was measured with an optical system in four specimens. Results Micromotion values derived from the displacement sensors were significantly higher than those measured by the optical system ( P < 0.005). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that bone density ( P < 0.0005) and load ( P < 0.0001) had a significant effect on implant micromotion, however the effect of implant size was not statistically significant ( P = 0.123). Interpretation Micromotion of this stemless design was shown to be significantly dependent on cancellous bone density. Patients must therefore have adequate bone quality for this procedure. The influence of load magnitude on micromotion emphasizes the need for controlled post-operative rehabilitation. Measurements with displacement sensors overestimate true interface micromotion by up to 50% and correction by an optical system is strongly recommended.
ISSN:0268-0033
1879-1271
DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.12.004