Limitations of the Anticholinergic Activity Assay and Assay-Based Anticholinergic Drug Scales

Objective The anticholinergic activity (AA) assay is a common method to determine a patient's anticholinergic load. Several limitations, however, are expected when applying the AA assay to patients or using drug scales to estimate anticholinergic burden based on AA levels. This study aims to de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of geriatric psychiatry 2016-12, Vol.24 (12), p.1182-1188
Hauptverfasser: Mayer, Tanja, pharmacist, Kopitz, Jürgen, Ph.D, Plaschke, Konstanze, Dr.Sc.Hum, Weiss, Johanna, Ph.D, Seidling, Hanna M., Dr.Sc.Hum, Haefeli, Walter E., M.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective The anticholinergic activity (AA) assay is a common method to determine a patient's anticholinergic load. Several limitations, however, are expected when applying the AA assay to patients or using drug scales to estimate anticholinergic burden based on AA levels. This study aims to demonstrate common pitfalls in an experimental setting and outline their clinical consequences. Methods The AA was analyzed for five drugs with reported interaction with muscarinic receptors. Concentration-response curves were constructed for furosemide (weak anticholinergic), diphenhydramine (moderate anticholinergic), the strong anticholinergic amitriptyline and its metabolite nortriptyline, and the cholinergic pilocarpine. The Combination Index (CI) was used to assess the interaction of three drug combinations with amitriptyline. Results All compounds displaced the radioactive tracer from its receptor binding site in a concentration-dependent manner, and full displacement was reached for all compounds except furosemide (Emax 16%). The CI indicated that amitriptyline and thioridazine have antagonistic effects (CI = 1.46) at low and synergistic effects (CI = 0.88) at higher concentrations (p 
ISSN:1064-7481
1545-7214
DOI:10.1016/j.jagp.2016.07.024