Selecting initial treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia in older adults
Abstract More than half of the patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) are older than 60 years. The treatment outcomes in this group remain poor with a median overall survival of < 1 year. Selecting initial treatment for these patients involves an assessment of ‘fitness’ for induction chemoth...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Blood reviews 2017-03, Vol.31 (2), p.43-62 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract More than half of the patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) are older than 60 years. The treatment outcomes in this group remain poor with a median overall survival of < 1 year. Selecting initial treatment for these patients involves an assessment of ‘fitness’ for induction chemotherapy. This is done based on patient and disease-related characteristics which help to estimate treatment-related mortality and chance of complete remission with induction chemotherapy. If the risk of treatment-related mortality is high and/or the likelihood of a patient achieving a complete remission is low, lower-intensity treatment (low-dose cytarabine, decitabine and azacitidine) should be discussed. As outcomes in both groups of patients remain poor, enrolment into clinical trials of novel agents with varying mechanisms of action should be considered for all older adults with AML. Novel agents in Phase III development include CPX-351, guadecitabine (SGI-110), quizartinib, crenolanib, sapacitabine, vosaroxin and volasertib. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0268-960X 1532-1681 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.blre.2016.09.005 |