Mitigation of Ventilator-induced Diaphragm Atrophy by Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation

Ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction is a significant contributor to weaning difficulty in ventilated critically ill patients. It has been hypothesized that electrically pacing the diaphragm during mechanical ventilation could reduce diaphragm dysfunction. We tested a novel, central line cathete...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 2017-02, Vol.195 (3), p.339-348
Hauptverfasser: Reynolds, Steven C, Meyyappan, Ramasamy, Thakkar, Viral, Tran, Bao D, Nolette, Marc-André, Sadarangani, Gautam, Sandoval, Rodrigo A, Bruulsema, Laura, Hannigan, Brett, Li, Jason W, Rohrs, Elizabeth, Zurba, Jason, Hoffer, Joaquín Andrés
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction is a significant contributor to weaning difficulty in ventilated critically ill patients. It has been hypothesized that electrically pacing the diaphragm during mechanical ventilation could reduce diaphragm dysfunction. We tested a novel, central line catheter-based, transvenous phrenic nerve pacing therapy for protecting the diaphragm in sedated and ventilated pigs. Eighteen Yorkshire pigs were studied. Six pigs were sedated and mechanically ventilated for 2.5 days with pacing on alternate breaths at intensities that reduced the ventilator pressure-time product by 20-30%. Six matched subjects were similarly sedated and ventilated but were not paced. Six pigs served as never-ventilated, never-paced control animals. Cumulative duration of pacing therapy ranged from 19.7 to 35.7 hours. Diaphragm thickness assessed by ultrasound and normalized to initial value showed a significant decline in ventilated-not paced but not in ventilated-paced subjects (0.84 [interquartile range (IQR), 0.78-0.89] vs. 1.10 [IQR, 1.02-1.24]; P = 0.001). Compared with control animals (24.6 μm /kg; IQR, 21.6-26.0), median myofiber cross-sectional areas normalized to weight and sarcomere length were significantly smaller in the ventilated-not paced (17.9 μm /kg; IQR, 15.3-23.7; P = 0.005) but not in the ventilated-paced group (24.9 μm /kg; IQR, 16.6-27.3; P = 0.351). After 60 hours of mechanical ventilation all six ventilated-paced subjects tolerated 8 minutes of intense phrenic stimulation, whereas three of six ventilated-not paced subjects did not (P = 0.055). There was a nonsignificant decrease in diaphragm tetanic force production over the experiment in the ventilated-paced and ventilated-not paced groups. These results suggest that early transvenous phrenic nerve pacing may mitigate ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction.
ISSN:1073-449X
1535-4970
DOI:10.1164/rccm.201502-0363oc