Catheter-directed treatment for acute pulmonary embolism: Systematic review and single-arm meta-analyses

Abstract Background We sought to estimate the efficacy and safety outcomes of catheter-directed treatment (CDT) for patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods We searched SCOPUS for studies reporting outcomes after CDT for acute PE. Studies were categorized in three groups for analyses due...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cardiology 2016-12, Vol.225, p.128-139
Hauptverfasser: Bajaj, Navkaranbir S, Kalra, Rajat, Arora, Pankaj, Ather, Sameer, Guichard, Jason L, Lancaster, W. Jake, Patel, Nirav, Raman, Fabio, Arora, Garima, Al Solaiman, Firas, Clark, D. Trey, Dell'Italia, Louis J, Leesar, Massoud A, Davies, James E, McGiffin, David C, Ahmed, Mustafa I
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background We sought to estimate the efficacy and safety outcomes of catheter-directed treatment (CDT) for patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods We searched SCOPUS for studies reporting outcomes after CDT for acute PE. Studies were categorized in three groups for analyses due to heterogeneity in the classification of acute PE: 1) patients with PE causing right ventricular dysfunction and haemodynamic instability: unstable haemodynamic status, 2) patients with PE causing right ventricular dysfunction where study outcomes were not stratified by haemodynamic status: stable and unstable haemodynamic status, and 3) patients with PE causing right ventricular dysfunction who remained haemodynamically stable: stable haemodynamic status. Efficacy and safety outcomes were estimated and presented as point estimates with 95% confidence intervals. Results In 35 studies with 1253 patients, 1277 CDTs were performed. The in-hospital mortality rates for the unstable haemodynamic status, stable and unstable haemodynamic status, and stable haemodynamic status groups were 18.1% (7.3–38.2%), 7.1% (5.0–10.1%), and 2.6% (0.8–7.3%), respectively. The major bleeding rates across the groups were estimated to be 4.5, 8.5 and 3.9 per 100 CDTs, respectively. Minor bleeding occurred in 6.2, 11.9 and 9.1 per 100 CDTs, respectively. After CDT, all groups had improvements in mean pulmonary artery pressure and right ventricular function. Conclusions We provide descriptive measures of efficacy and safety for patients who underwent CDT for acute PE.
ISSN:0167-5273
1874-1754
DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.036