Effect of Disease Activity, Glucocorticoid Exposure, and Rituximab on Body Composition During Induction Treatment of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody–Associated Vasculitis

Objective We investigated the relationships between glucocorticoid use, disease activity, and changes in body mass index (BMI) in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–associated vasculitis (AAV). Methods We analyzed AAV patients enrolled in the Rituximab in AAV trial. Glucocorticoid use...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthritis care & research (2010) 2017-07, Vol.69 (7), p.1004-1010
Hauptverfasser: Wallace, Zachary S., Miloslavsky, Eli M., Cascino, Matthew, Unizony, Sebastian H., Lu, Na, Hoffman, Gary S., Kallenberg, Cees G. M., Langford, Carol A., Merkel, Peter A., Monach, Paul A., Seo, Philip, Spiera, Robert, St.Clair, E. William, Specks, Ulrich, Brunetta, Paul, Choi, Hyon K., Stone, John H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective We investigated the relationships between glucocorticoid use, disease activity, and changes in body mass index (BMI) in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–associated vasculitis (AAV). Methods We analyzed AAV patients enrolled in the Rituximab in AAV trial. Glucocorticoid use, BMI, and disease activity were measured regularly during the trial period. We performed mixed‐effects regressions to examine the associations of time‐dependent cumulative average glucocorticoid use and disease activity with changes in BMI over time, while adjusting for potential confounders. Results The mean ± SD baseline BMI of the 197 patients enrolled was 28.8 ± 6.3 kg/m2. Patients with newly diagnosed AAV tended to have a lower mean ± SD BMI than those with relapsing disease (28.0 ± 5.7 kg/m2 versus 29.6 ± 6.8 kg/m2) and higher disease activity (mean ± SD Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegener's Granulomatosis 8.7 ± 3.3 versus 7.4 ± 2.7). The most significant change in BMI occurred during the first 6 months of the trial (mean ± SD increase of 1.1 ± 2.2 kg/m2; P 
ISSN:2151-464X
2151-4658
DOI:10.1002/acr.23099