Life Expectancy after Myocardial Infarction, According to Hospital Performance
In an analysis of more than 119,000 patients with acute MI admitted to over 1800 hospitals, patients treated in high-performing hospitals (with low 30-day risk-standardized mortality) had longer life expectancies than those treated in low-performing hospitals. Public reporting has become a mainstay...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2016-10, Vol.375 (14), p.1332-1342 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In an analysis of more than 119,000 patients with acute MI admitted to over 1800 hospitals, patients treated in high-performing hospitals (with low 30-day risk-standardized mortality) had longer life expectancies than those treated in low-performing hospitals.
Public reporting has become a mainstay of national efforts to improve the quality of care delivered in U.S. hospitals.
1
Increasingly, risk-standardized mortality rates are used to benchmark quality and gauge hospital performance because they reflect meaningful and widely interpretable results of hospital care.
2
,
3
Since 2007, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has reported hospital-specific 30-day risk-standardized mortality rates for several common conditions, and more recently, risk-standardized mortality rates have been incorporated into payment policies.
4
–
6
Although several studies have evaluated the association of condition-specific risk-standardized mortality rates with other short-term quality metrics,
7
–
16
it is not known . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMoa1513223 |