Men with intellectual disabilities with a history of sexual offending: empathy for victims of sexual and non-sexual crimes
Background The objectives were (a) to compare the general empathy abilities of men with intellectual disabilities (IDs) who had a history of sexual offending to men with IDs who had no known history of illegal behaviour; and (b) to determine whether men with IDs who had a history of sexual offending...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of intellectual disability research 2015-04, Vol.59 (4), p.332-341 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
The objectives were (a) to compare the general empathy abilities of men with intellectual disabilities (IDs) who had a history of sexual offending to men with IDs who had no known history of illegal behaviour; and (b) to determine whether men with IDs who had a history of sexual offending had different levels of specific victim empathy towards their own victim, in comparison with an unknown victim of sexual crime, and a victim of non‐sexual crime, and make comparisons with non‐offenders.
Methods
Men with mild IDs (n = 35) were asked to complete a measure of general empathy and a measure of specific victim empathy. All participants completed the victim empathy measure in relation to a hypothetical victim of a sexual offence, and a non‐sexual crime, while additionally, men with a history of sexual offending were asked to complete this measure in relation to their own most recent victim.
Results
Men with a history of sexual offending had significantly lower general empathy, and specific victim empathy towards an unknown sexual offence victim, than men with no known history of illegal behaviour. Men with a history of sexual offending had significantly lower victim empathy for their own victim than for an unknown sexual offence victim. Victim empathy towards an unknown victim of a non‐sexual crime did not differ significantly between the two groups.
Conclusions
The findings suggest that it is important include interventions within treatment programmes that attempt to improve empathy and perspective‐taking. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0964-2633 1365-2788 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jir.12137 |