Absence of Respiratory Muscle Fatigue in High-Intensity Continuous or Interval Cycling Exercise

ABSTRACTKurti, SP, Smith, JR, Emerson, SR, Castinado, KM, and Harms, CA. Absence of respiratory muscle fatigue in high-intensity continuous or interval cycling exercise. J Strength Cond Res 29(11)3171–3176, 2015—Respiratory muscle fatigue (RMF) occurs during prolonged exercise (∼15–20 minutes) at &g...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of strength and conditioning research 2015-11, Vol.29 (11), p.3171-3176
Hauptverfasser: Kurti, Stephanie P, Smith, Joshua R, Emerson, Sam R, Castinado, Kenneth M, Harms, Craig A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACTKurti, SP, Smith, JR, Emerson, SR, Castinado, KM, and Harms, CA. Absence of respiratory muscle fatigue in high-intensity continuous or interval cycling exercise. J Strength Cond Res 29(11)3171–3176, 2015—Respiratory muscle fatigue (RMF) occurs during prolonged exercise (∼15–20 minutes) at >85% V[Combining Dot Above]O2max. However, RMF has been reported to occur in ∼3–6 minutes in various modes of exercise at a high intensity. It is not known if continuous cycling exercise vs. repeated bouts of high-intensity interval training (HIT) at >85% V[Combining Dot Above]O2max will lead to RMF. We hypothesized that RMF would occur after a constant load test and would be present before end exercise in an HIT protocol. Eight moderately active healthy men (21.7 ± 1.7 years; 181.3 ± 5.2 cm; 81.3 ± 2.3 kg) completed a V[Combining Dot Above]O2max test on a cycle ergometer. Subjects then completed 2 bouts of HIT (7 × 1 minute, 2-minute recovery between intervals) and 3 bouts of continuous exercise (CE) tests at 90% of peak power (determined from an incremental exercise test to exhaustion). Maximal inspiratory pressure (PIMAX) and expiratory pressure (PEMAX) were measured pre- and post-exercise for both HIT and CE and after each interval during HIT. Decreases in postexercise PIMAX and PEMAX compared with baseline were used to determine RMF. There were no differences (p > 0.05) in PIMAX or PEMAX pre- to post-exercise for HIT (PIMAX pre134 ± 51, post135 ± 50 cmH2O; PEMAX pre143 ± 41, post148 ± 46 cmH2O) or CE (PIMAX pre135 ± 54, post133 ± 52 cmH2O; PEMAX pre146 ± 46, post148 ± 46 cmH2O) indicating RMF was not present following CE and HIT. These data suggest that repeated high-intensity cycling exercise at 90% peak power in a CE or HIT protocol does not lead to RMF.
ISSN:1064-8011
1533-4287
DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000000974