Reliability of diagnosis from Mohs slides: interpersonal and intrapersonal agreement on basal cell carcinoma presence and histological subtype

Summary Background The success of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) depends partly on the correct diagnosis of slides. Objectives To determine reliability of diagnosis from Mohs slides. Methods This was a prospective study evaluating the reliability of diagnosis from Mohs slides of basal cell carcinom...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of dermatology (1951) 2016-09, Vol.175 (3), p.549-554
Hauptverfasser: van Lee, C.B., Ip Vai Ching, E.E.F., Nasserinejad, K., Neumann, H.A.M., Bol, M.G.W., Dikrama, P.K., Kelleners-Smeets, N.W.J., Koljenović, S., Munte, K., Noordhoek Hegt, V., de Vijlder, H.C., Nijsten, T., van den Bos, R.R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Background The success of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) depends partly on the correct diagnosis of slides. Objectives To determine reliability of diagnosis from Mohs slides. Methods This was a prospective study evaluating the reliability of diagnosis from Mohs slides of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) presence, BCC location on the slide and BCC subtype among six raters who independently assessed 50 Mohs slides twice with a 2‐month interval. Slides were randomly selected whereby difficult‐to‐diagnose slides were oversampled. For each slide, a reference diagnosis was established by an expert panel. Cohen's kappa (κ) was calculated to determine levels of agreement interpersonally (rater vs. reference diagnosis) and intrapersonally (rater at T1 vs. T2). Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine independent risk factors for slides with interpersonal discordant diagnosis. The variables studied were BCC presence, whether a slide was scored as easy or difficult to diagnose, review duration of the 50 slides, profession and years of experience in diagnosis from Mohs slides. Results Interpersonal and intrapersonal agreement were substantial on BCC presence (κ = 0·66 and 0·68) and moderate on BCC subtype (κ = 0·45 and 0·55). Slides that were scored as difficult to diagnose were an independent risk factor for interpersonal discordant diagnosis on BCC presence (odds ratio 3·54, 95% confidence interval 1·81–6·84). Conclusions Reliability of diagnosis from Mohs slides was substantial on BCC presence and moderate on BCC subtype. For slides that are scored difficult to diagnose, a second opinion is recommended to prevent misinterpretation and thereby recurrence of skin cancer. What's already known about this topic? The success of Mohs surgery depends partly on the correct diagnosis of slides, while the reliability of diagnosis from Mohs slides is unknown. What does this study add? Interpersonal and intrapersonal levels of agreement were substantial on basal cell carcinoma (BCC) presence and moderate on BCC subtype. Slides that were self‐scored as difficult to diagnose were an independent risk factor for interpersonal discordant diagnosis on BCC presence. Plain language summary available online
ISSN:0007-0963
1365-2133
DOI:10.1111/bjd.14623