Yes, it Does: A Reply to the Comment by Banse
The occurrence of excess major nutrients in offshore waters of the Gulf of Alaska, equatorial Pacific, and Southern Ocean raises the obvious question: what prevents the phytoplankton from blooming and depleting the nutrients, as is the normal situation in nearshore environment? Based on Fe abundance...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Limnology and oceanography 1990-05, Vol.35 (3), p.775-777 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The occurrence of excess major nutrients in offshore waters of the Gulf of Alaska, equatorial Pacific, and Southern Ocean raises the obvious question: what prevents the phytoplankton from blooming and depleting the nutrients, as is the normal situation in nearshore environment? Based on Fe abundance inshore and scarcity offshore (Martin et al. 1989), we think the answer involves iron deficiency. Banse's (1990) comment ignores most of the work we painstakingly performed in the Gulf of Alaska. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0024-3590 1939-5590 |
DOI: | 10.4319/lo.1990.35.3.0775 |