Two-Center Prospective, Randomized, Clinical, and Radiographic Study Comparing Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation with or without Bone Graft and Simultaneous Implant Placement

Purpose To evaluate stability and success rate of hydrophilic nanostructured implants placed via osteotome sinus floor elevation (OSFE) without grafting material or using β‐tricalcium phosphate (β‐TCP), deproteinized bovine bone (DBB), or their combination, and also to assess three‐dimensional volum...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical implant dentistry and related research 2016-10, Vol.18 (5), p.873-882
Hauptverfasser: Marković, Aleksa, Mišić, Tijana, Calvo-Guirado, José Luís, Delgado-Ruíz, Rafael Arcesio, Janjić, Bojan, Abboud, Marcus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To evaluate stability and success rate of hydrophilic nanostructured implants placed via osteotome sinus floor elevation (OSFE) without grafting material or using β‐tricalcium phosphate (β‐TCP), deproteinized bovine bone (DBB), or their combination, and also to assess three‐dimensional volumetric stability of endo‐sinus bone gained in the aforementioned conditions. Materials and Methods OSFE with simultaneous implant placement (10‐mm long SLActive‐BL®, Straumann, Basel, Switzerland) was performed. Grafting materials were randomly allocated to implant sites, whereas one site was left without graft. Implant stability was measured by resonance frequency analysis over 6 months. Implant success was evaluated after 2 years of loading. Volume of new endo‐sinus bone was calculated from CBCT images using 3D Slicer® software. Results A total of 180 implants were inserted into posterior maxilla of 45 patients with 6.59 ± 0.45 mm of residual bone height, and all remained successful after 2 years. Implant stability steadily increased during healing, without significant difference between groups (p = .658). After 2 years, endo‐sinus bone significantly shrank (p 
ISSN:1523-0899
1708-8208
DOI:10.1111/cid.12373