Re‐evaluating the eVALuate study and the NICE guidelines: a personal review
The eVALuate study, which compared outcomes after vaginal, abdominal and laparoscopic hysterectomy, was published in 2004 (Garry et al. BMJ 2004;328:129–33, Sculpher et al. BMJ 2004;328:134–9, Garry et al. Health Tech Assess 2004;8:1–154). It comprised two parallel studies involving a total of 1380...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2016-10, Vol.123 (11), p.1796-1796 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The eVALuate study, which compared outcomes after vaginal, abdominal and laparoscopic hysterectomy, was published in 2004 (Garry et al. BMJ 2004;328:129–33, Sculpher et al. BMJ 2004;328:134–9, Garry et al. Health Tech Assess 2004;8:1–154). It comprised two parallel studies involving a total of 1380 hysterectomies performed by 43 surgeons in 28 centres. It remains the largest randomised trial in the world literature in the field of hysterectomy and its contents have been given considerable weighting in the many subsequent meta-analyses including the NICE recommendations on ‘laparoscopic techniques for hysterectomy’ (nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg239ipg. 2004). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1470-0328 1471-0528 |
DOI: | 10.1111/1471-0528.13892 |