Changes in P2Y12 reaction units after switching treatments from prasugrel to clopidogrel in Japanese patients with acute coronary syndrome followed by elective coronary stenting

Patients with ischemic heart disease are administered a dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. This consists of aspirin and thienopyridine, which can be switched from prasugrel to clopidogrel. However, the impact of switching is unknown. This study aimed to determine the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics 2017-10, Vol.32 (4), p.341-350
Hauptverfasser: Ueno, Takafumi, Koiwaya, Hiroshi, Sasaki, Ken-ichiro, Katsuki, Yoshio, Katsuda, Yousuke, Murasato, Yoshinobu, Shimamatsu, Junichiro, Umeji, Kyoko, Otsuka, Yoritaka, Kawasaki, Tomohiro, Shibata, Yoshisato, Fukumoto, Yoshihiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Patients with ischemic heart disease are administered a dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. This consists of aspirin and thienopyridine, which can be switched from prasugrel to clopidogrel. However, the impact of switching is unknown. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of switching from prasugrel to clopidogrel in Japanese patients. One-hundred and thirty-six patients with acute coronary syndrome scheduled to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention and patients with coronary artery disease requiring elective coronary stenting were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned into the following groups: prasugrel for 6 weeks at loading/maintenance doses of 20/3.75 mg (Continued Group; n  = 68) or prasugrel at 20/3.75 mg for 2 weeks followed by clopidogrel at 75 mg for 4 weeks (Switched Group; n  = 68). Aspirin (loading dose/maintenance dose 324/81–100 mg/day) was coadministered in both groups. The primary endpoint was the mean P2Y 12 reaction unit (PRU) at week 6 and the secondary endpoint was the PRU in groups subdivided based on the presence of CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms. At week 6, the PRU was significantly lower in the Continued Group relative to the Switched Group (140.7 and 183.0, respectively; P  
ISSN:1868-4300
1868-4297
DOI:10.1007/s12928-016-0417-x