The Influence of Computerized Interpretation of an Electrocardiogram Reading

The multivariate analysis, adjusted by age and number of ECGs interpreted a week, showed that using a correct automated interpretation, in comparison of not using it, had an odds ratio of a better diagnostic success of 2.09 (95% confidence interval, 1.52-2.87; P

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	The American journal of emergency medicine 2016-10, Vol.34 (10), p.2031-2032
Hauptverfasser:	Martínez-Losas, Pedro, Higueras, Javier, Gómez-Polo, Juan Carlos, Brabyn, Philip, Ferrer, Juan Manuel Fuentes, Godoy, Victoria Cañadas, Villacastín, Julián Pérez
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Adult Automation Cardiac arrhythmia Cardiology Confidence intervals Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods Diagnostic Errors - prevention & control Electrocardiography Electrocardiography - methods Emergency Emergency medical care Female Heart attacks Heart Diseases - diagnosis Heart Diseases - physiopathology Hospitals Humans Male Multivariate analysis Myocardial infarction Reading Success
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	The multivariate analysis, adjusted by age and number of ECGs interpreted a week, showed that using a correct automated interpretation, in comparison of not using it, had an odds ratio of a better diagnostic success of 2.09 (95% confidence interval, 1.52-2.87; P
ISSN:	0735-6757 1532-8171
DOI:	10.1016/j.ajem.2016.07.029