Efficacy of First-Time Intragastric Balloon in Weight Loss: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background The intragastric balloon (IGB) is an adjunctive treatment for obesity. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IGB treatment by reviewing randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods A total of 20 RCTs involving 1195 patients were identified. Weight loss results be...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Obesity surgery 2017-02, Vol.27 (2), p.277-287 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
The intragastric balloon (IGB) is an adjunctive treatment for obesity. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IGB treatment by reviewing randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Methods
A total of 20 RCTs involving 1195 patients were identified. Weight loss results before and after 3 months were analyzed separately. The weight loss results of patients with and without IGB treatment were compared.
Results
Our meta-analysis calculated the following significant effect sizes: 1.59 and 1.34 kg/m
2
for overall and 3-month BMI loss, respectively; 14.25 and 11.16 % for overall and >3-month percentage of excess weight loss, respectively; 4.6 and 4.77 kg for overall and 3-month weight loss, respectively; and 2.81, 1.62, and 4.09 % for overall, 3-month, and >3-month percent of weight loss, respectively. A significant effect size was calculated that favored fluid-filled IGBs over air-filled IGBs. Flatulence (8.75 vs. 3.89 %,
p
= 0.0006), abdominal fullness (6.32 vs. 0.55 %,
p
= 0.001), abdominal pain (13.86 vs. 7.2 %,
p
= 0.0001), abdominal discomfort (4.37 vs. 0.55 %,
p
= 0.006), and gastric ulcer (12.5 vs. 1.2 %,
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0960-8923 1708-0428 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11695-016-2296-8 |