Is there any analgesic benefit from preoperative vs. postoperative administration of etoricoxib in total knee arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia?: A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUNDOptimal postoperative analgesia is a challenge for the anaesthesiologist, with the ideal combination of methods, drugs, doses and timing of administration still the subject of research. The COX-2 inhibitors are a class of NSAIDs that may provide useful perioperative analgesia but the optim...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of anaesthesiology 2016-11, Vol.33 (11), p.840-845
Hauptverfasser: Munteanu, Ana Maria, Cionac Florescu, Simona, Anastase, Denisa Madalina, Stoica, Cristian Ioan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUNDOptimal postoperative analgesia is a challenge for the anaesthesiologist, with the ideal combination of methods, drugs, doses and timing of administration still the subject of research. The COX-2 inhibitors are a class of NSAIDs that may provide useful perioperative analgesia but the optimal timing of administration has not been elucidated. OBJECTIVEWe hypothesised that etoricoxib given 1 h before total knee arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia will decrease the cumulative dose of intravenous and subcutaneous morphine required to maintain pain intensity of 3 or less on a 10-point numerical rating scale (NRS) during the first postoperative 48 h compared with the same dose of etoricoxib given after surgery. DESIGNRandomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTINGUniversity hospital, between January and September, 2014. PATIENTSOverall, 165 patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia. INTERVENTIONSThe patients were randomised into one of three groupsthe ETORICOX-PREOP group received etoricoxib 120 mg orally 1 h before surgery, one placebo pill at the end of surgery and a further 120 mg etoricoxib after 24 h; the ETORICOX-POSTOP group received one placebo pill 1 h before surgery and etoricoxib 120 mg at the end of surgery and after 24 h. The PLACEBO group received one placebo pill 1 h before surgery, one at end of surgery and a third after 24 h. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESThe primary outcome measure was the cumulative dose of intravenous and subcutaneous morphine required during the first postoperative 48 h to maintain a 10-point numerical pain rating scale value of 3 or less. Secondary outcomes measures were duration of analgesia from initiation of spinal anaesthesia until the first analgesic requirement and the side-effects of the treatment. RESULTSThe quantity of morphine over the first postoperative 48 h required by the ETORICOX-PREOP group (44 ± 16 mg) and the ETORICOX-POSTOP group (52 ± 23 mg) were both significantly less than the PLACEBO group (71 ± 20 mg) (P = 0.001), demonstrating a morphine-sparing effect of etoricoxib of the order of 30%; the difference between the PRE vs. POST groups was statistically significant (P = 0.02), favouring a preemptive analgesic effect. Also, there was evidence of a longer time to first analgesia compared with PLACEBO in the PREOP group (P = 0.02) but no significant difference between PREOP and POSTOP groups (P = 0.30). There was no difference in side-effects among the three stu
ISSN:0265-0215
1365-2346
DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000000521