Controversies in Intramedullary Fixation for Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures
Intertrochanteric hip fractures are common and costly. Intramedullary fixation has gained popularity as a means of stabilizing intertrochanteric hip fractures. This review article presents some of the controversies surrounding the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures using a cephalomedullary nai...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of orthopaedic trauma 2016-12, Vol.30 (12), p.635-641 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 641 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | 635 |
| container_title | Journal of orthopaedic trauma |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Baldwin, Paul C Lavender, Randy C Sanders, Roy Koval, Kenneth J |
| description | Intertrochanteric hip fractures are common and costly. Intramedullary fixation has gained popularity as a means of stabilizing intertrochanteric hip fractures. This review article presents some of the controversies surrounding the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures using a cephalomedullary nail. These topics include nail length, the need for distal interlocking, proximal screw design, the number of proximal lag screws, and integrated proximal sliding lag screws.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000652 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826724625</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826724625</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4012-4879918393eeaf68d8eb77832f0aa551ba9974f1bbc93aaa389d41e94cdf41de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFPwyAUgInRuDn9B8b06KWTB7SFoy5OlyzZZZ4bSl-zajcmtE7_vTSbxnhQLvDge-_BByGXQMdAVXZzt1iO6c-RJuyIDCHhEDOm4JgMqVQ0TjhXA3Lm_XNgJGXslAxYJniWghiS-cRuWmff0PkafVRvolmI9RrLrmm0-4im9btua7uJKuv6M3QBNyvdr2oTPdbbaOq0aTuH_pycVLrxeHGYR-Rper-cPMbzxcNscjuPjaDAYiEzpUByxRF1lcpSYpFlkrOKap0kUGilMlFBURjFtdZcqlIAKmHKSkCJfESu93W3zr526Nt8XXuD4cIbtJ3PQbI0YyJlSUDFHjXOeu-wyreuXoeH5UDz3mMePOa_PYa0q0OHrgguvpO-xAVA7oGdbYIJ_9J0O3T5CnXTrv6rLf5I7akE-j-kkAILUdxvAf8EHbePKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826724625</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Controversies in Intramedullary Fixation for Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Baldwin, Paul C ; Lavender, Randy C ; Sanders, Roy ; Koval, Kenneth J</creator><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, Paul C ; Lavender, Randy C ; Sanders, Roy ; Koval, Kenneth J</creatorcontrib><description>Intertrochanteric hip fractures are common and costly. Intramedullary fixation has gained popularity as a means of stabilizing intertrochanteric hip fractures. This review article presents some of the controversies surrounding the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures using a cephalomedullary nail. These topics include nail length, the need for distal interlocking, proximal screw design, the number of proximal lag screws, and integrated proximal sliding lag screws.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-5339</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-2291</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000652</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27437614</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - economics ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - instrumentation ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - statistics & numerical data ; Health Care Costs - statistics & numerical data ; Hip Fractures - economics ; Hip Fractures - epidemiology ; Hip Fractures - surgery ; Humans ; Postoperative Complications - economics ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - prevention & control ; Prevalence ; Risk Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2016-12, Vol.30 (12), p.635-641</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4012-4879918393eeaf68d8eb77832f0aa551ba9974f1bbc93aaa389d41e94cdf41de3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4012-4879918393eeaf68d8eb77832f0aa551ba9974f1bbc93aaa389d41e94cdf41de3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27437614$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, Paul C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavender, Randy C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Roy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koval, Kenneth J</creatorcontrib><title>Controversies in Intramedullary Fixation for Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic trauma</title><addtitle>J Orthop Trauma</addtitle><description>Intertrochanteric hip fractures are common and costly. Intramedullary fixation has gained popularity as a means of stabilizing intertrochanteric hip fractures. This review article presents some of the controversies surrounding the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures using a cephalomedullary nail. These topics include nail length, the need for distal interlocking, proximal screw design, the number of proximal lag screws, and integrated proximal sliding lag screws.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - economics</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - instrumentation</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Health Care Costs - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Hip Fractures - economics</subject><subject>Hip Fractures - epidemiology</subject><subject>Hip Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - economics</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0890-5339</issn><issn>1531-2291</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFPwyAUgInRuDn9B8b06KWTB7SFoy5OlyzZZZ4bSl-zajcmtE7_vTSbxnhQLvDge-_BByGXQMdAVXZzt1iO6c-RJuyIDCHhEDOm4JgMqVQ0TjhXA3Lm_XNgJGXslAxYJniWghiS-cRuWmff0PkafVRvolmI9RrLrmm0-4im9btua7uJKuv6M3QBNyvdr2oTPdbbaOq0aTuH_pycVLrxeHGYR-Rper-cPMbzxcNscjuPjaDAYiEzpUByxRF1lcpSYpFlkrOKap0kUGilMlFBURjFtdZcqlIAKmHKSkCJfESu93W3zr526Nt8XXuD4cIbtJ3PQbI0YyJlSUDFHjXOeu-wyreuXoeH5UDz3mMePOa_PYa0q0OHrgguvpO-xAVA7oGdbYIJ_9J0O3T5CnXTrv6rLf5I7akE-j-kkAILUdxvAf8EHbePKA</recordid><startdate>201612</startdate><enddate>201612</enddate><creator>Baldwin, Paul C</creator><creator>Lavender, Randy C</creator><creator>Sanders, Roy</creator><creator>Koval, Kenneth J</creator><general>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201612</creationdate><title>Controversies in Intramedullary Fixation for Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures</title><author>Baldwin, Paul C ; Lavender, Randy C ; Sanders, Roy ; Koval, Kenneth J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4012-4879918393eeaf68d8eb77832f0aa551ba9974f1bbc93aaa389d41e94cdf41de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - economics</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - instrumentation</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Health Care Costs - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Hip Fractures - economics</topic><topic>Hip Fractures - epidemiology</topic><topic>Hip Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - economics</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, Paul C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavender, Randy C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Roy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koval, Kenneth J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic trauma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baldwin, Paul C</au><au>Lavender, Randy C</au><au>Sanders, Roy</au><au>Koval, Kenneth J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Controversies in Intramedullary Fixation for Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic trauma</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Trauma</addtitle><date>2016-12</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>635</spage><epage>641</epage><pages>635-641</pages><issn>0890-5339</issn><eissn>1531-2291</eissn><abstract>Intertrochanteric hip fractures are common and costly. Intramedullary fixation has gained popularity as a means of stabilizing intertrochanteric hip fractures. This review article presents some of the controversies surrounding the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures using a cephalomedullary nail. These topics include nail length, the need for distal interlocking, proximal screw design, the number of proximal lag screws, and integrated proximal sliding lag screws.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>27437614</pmid><doi>10.1097/BOT.0000000000000652</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0890-5339 |
| ispartof | Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2016-12, Vol.30 (12), p.635-641 |
| issn | 0890-5339 1531-2291 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826724625 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
| subjects | Evidence-Based Medicine Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - economics Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - instrumentation Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - statistics & numerical data Health Care Costs - statistics & numerical data Hip Fractures - economics Hip Fractures - epidemiology Hip Fractures - surgery Humans Postoperative Complications - economics Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Postoperative Complications - prevention & control Prevalence Risk Factors Treatment Outcome |
| title | Controversies in Intramedullary Fixation for Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A51%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Controversies%20in%20Intramedullary%20Fixation%20for%20Intertrochanteric%20Hip%20Fractures&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20trauma&rft.au=Baldwin,%20Paul%20C&rft.date=2016-12&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=635&rft.epage=641&rft.pages=635-641&rft.issn=0890-5339&rft.eissn=1531-2291&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000652&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826724625%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826724625&rft_id=info:pmid/27437614&rfr_iscdi=true |