Controversies in Intramedullary Fixation for Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures
Intertrochanteric hip fractures are common and costly. Intramedullary fixation has gained popularity as a means of stabilizing intertrochanteric hip fractures. This review article presents some of the controversies surrounding the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures using a cephalomedullary nai...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of orthopaedic trauma 2016-12, Vol.30 (12), p.635-641 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Intertrochanteric hip fractures are common and costly. Intramedullary fixation has gained popularity as a means of stabilizing intertrochanteric hip fractures. This review article presents some of the controversies surrounding the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures using a cephalomedullary nail. These topics include nail length, the need for distal interlocking, proximal screw design, the number of proximal lag screws, and integrated proximal sliding lag screws.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0890-5339 1531-2291 |
DOI: | 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000652 |