Angioedema in the omalizumab chronic idiopathic/spontaneous urticaria pivotal studies

Abstract Background Angioedema, present in some patients with chronic idiopathic/spontaneous urticaria (CIU/CSU), may have a negative effect on patient quality of life. Objective To describe patient-reported angioedema and its management in the pivotal omalizumab studies (ASTERIA I, ASTERIA II, GLAC...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of allergy, asthma, & immunology asthma, & immunology, 2016-10, Vol.117 (4), p.370-377.e1
Hauptverfasser: Zazzali, James L., PhD, MPH, Kaplan, Allen, MD, Maurer, Marcus, MD, Raimundo, Karina, MS, Trzaskoma, Benjamin, MS, Solari, Paul G., MD, Antonova, Evgeniya, PhD, Mendelson, Meryl, MD, Rosén, Karin E., MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Angioedema, present in some patients with chronic idiopathic/spontaneous urticaria (CIU/CSU), may have a negative effect on patient quality of life. Objective To describe patient-reported angioedema and its management in the pivotal omalizumab studies (ASTERIA I, ASTERIA II, GLACIAL). Methods Enrolled patients with CIU/CSU remained symptomatic despite treatment with histamine1 (H1 )-antihistamines at licensed doses (ASTERIA I, ASTERIA II) or H1 -antihistamines at up to 4 times the approved dose plus H2 -antihistamines and/or a leukotriene receptor antagonist (GLACIAL). All studies administered omalizumab (75, 150, or 300 mg in ASTERIA I and ASTERIA II; 300 mg in GLACIAL) or placebo subcutaneously every 4 weeks for at least 12 weeks. Urticaria Patient Daily Diary entries were completed by patients and summarized. Results At baseline, angioedema prevalence was higher in GLACIAL (53.1%) than in ASTERIA I (47.5%) or ASTERIA II (40.7%). The mean proportion of angioedema-free days during weeks 4 to 12 was greater for patients treated with 300 mg of omalizumab than placebo in ASTERIA I (96.1% vs 88.2%, P < .001), ASTERIA II (95.5% vs 89.2%, P < .001), and GLACIAL (91.0% vs 88.7%, P  = .006). Most patient-reported angioedema was managed by low-intensity interventions (doing nothing or taking medication). Conclusion Treatment with 300 mg of omalizumab was efficacious in reducing patient-reported angioedema. Low-intensity interventions were generally used to manage angioedema episodes. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01287117 (ASTERIA I), NCT01292473 (ASTERIA II), and NCT01264939 (GLACIAL).
ISSN:1081-1206
1534-4436
DOI:10.1016/j.anai.2016.06.024