Near-IR transillumination and reflectance imaging at 1,300 nm and 1,500-1,700 nm for in vivo caries detection

Introduction Several studies suggest that near‐IR imaging methods at wavelengths longer than 1,300 nm have great potential for caries detection. In this study, the diagnostic performance of both near‐IR transillumination and near‐IR reflectance was assessed on teeth scheduled for extraction due to o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lasers in surgery and medicine 2016-11, Vol.48 (9), p.828-836
Hauptverfasser: Simon, Jacob C., Lucas, Seth A., Staninec, Michal, Tom, Henry, Chan, Kenneth H., Darling, Cynthia L., Cozin, Matthew J., Lee, Robert C., Fried, Daniel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Several studies suggest that near‐IR imaging methods at wavelengths longer than 1,300 nm have great potential for caries detection. In this study, the diagnostic performance of both near‐IR transillumination and near‐IR reflectance was assessed on teeth scheduled for extraction due to orthodontic treatment (n = 109 teeth on 40 test subjects). Methods Three intra‐oral near‐IR imaging probes were fabricated for the acquisition of in vivo images using a high definition InGaAs camera and near‐IR broadband light sources. Two transillumination probes provided occlusal and approximal images using 1,300 nm light which manifests the highest transparency in enamel. A third reflectance probe utilized cross‐polarization and operated at wavelengths greater than 1,500 nm where water absorption is higher which reduces the reflectivity of sound tissues, significantly increasing lesion contrast. Teeth were collected after extraction and sectioned and examined with polarized light microscopy and microradiography which served as the gold standard. In addition, radiographs were taken of the teeth and the diagnostic performance of near‐IR imaging was compared with radiography. Results Near‐IR imaging was significantly more sensitive (P 
ISSN:0196-8092
1096-9101
DOI:10.1002/lsm.22549