Pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Long-term clinical outcomes with first- and second-generation cryoballoons

Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term success rates of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using only first-generation cryoballoon (CB-1) and second-generation CB (CB-2) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Patients and methods A total of 114 drug-refractory pat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Herz 2017-02, Vol.42 (1), p.91-97
Hauptverfasser: Koektuerk, B., Yorgun, H., Koch, A., Turan, C. H., Keskin, K., Dahmen, A., Hoppe, C., Gorr, E., Bansmann, P. M., Turan, R. G., Horlitz, M., Yang, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term success rates of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using only first-generation cryoballoon (CB-1) and second-generation CB (CB-2) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Patients and methods A total of 114 drug-refractory patients with PAF (mean age: 62 ± 10 years; 62.3 % males) were enrolled. All index ablation procedures were performed using a 28-mm CB. All patients were scheduled for outpatient clinic visits, followed by 24-h or 7‑day Holter electrocardiogram (EGC) evaluation. Results All PVs in the CB-1 group and 367 of 368 (99.7 %) PVs in the CB-2 group were completely isolated during the index procedure. The most commonly observed complication was phrenic nerve palsy in four (4.3 %) patients with CB-2. The mean follow-up period for CB-1 and CB-2 was 33.4 ± 14.9 and 27.2 ± 10.6 months, respectively. Freedom from AF was 42.9 % for CB-1 and 74.2 % for CB-2 at the end of the follow-up period. The European Heart Rhythm Association score improved in patients without AF recurrence after the procedure (2.8 ± 0.4 vs. 1.2 ± 0.5, p  < 0.001), whereas no significant improvement was observed in the symptomatic status of patients with recurrence (2.8 ± 0.4 vs. 2.2 ± 0.9, p  = 0.149). Conclusion Second-generation CB provided significantly better clinical outcomes than its predecessor and was associated with low peri- and postprocedural complications.
ISSN:0340-9937
1615-6692
DOI:10.1007/s00059-016-4441-5