Abdominal fat sub-depots and energy expenditure: Magnetic resonance imaging study

Summary Background & aims We aimed to assess the association between the distinct abdominal sub-depots and resting energy expenditure (REE). Methods We performed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to quantify abdominal visceral-adipose-tissue (VAT), deep-subcutaneous-adipose-tissue (deep-SAT), and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) Scotland), 2017-06, Vol.36 (3), p.804-811
Hauptverfasser: Serfaty, Dana, Rein, Michal, Schwarzfuchs, Dan, Shelef, Ilan, Gepner, Yftach, Bril, Nitzan, Cohen, Noa, Shemesh, Elad, Sarusi, Benjamin, Kovsan, Julia, Kenigsbuch, Shira, Chassidim, Yoash, Golan, Rachel, Witkow, Shula, Henkin, Yaakov, Stampfer, Meir J, Rudich, Assaf, Shai, Iris
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Background & aims We aimed to assess the association between the distinct abdominal sub-depots and resting energy expenditure (REE). Methods We performed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to quantify abdominal visceral-adipose-tissue (VAT), deep-subcutaneous-adipose-tissue (deep-SAT), and superficial-subcutaneous-adipose-tissue (superficial-SAT). We measured REE by indirect-calorimetry. Non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT) [1–3 metabolic equivalents (METs)] and exercise thermogenesis (activities of 4+METS ) were estimated based on 6-days of accelerometry to assess total physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE). Results We studied 282 participants: 249 men [mean age = 47.4 years, body-mass-index (BMI) = 31 kg/m2 , mean VAT proportion from total abdominal fat = 34.5%, mean superficial-SAT proportion from total abdominal fat = 24.3%] and 33 women (mean age = 51.2 years, BMI = 30.1 kg/m2 , mean VAT proportion from total abdominal fat = 22.8%, mean superficial-SAT proportion from total abdominal fat = 37.8%). As expected, women had lower REE [by 32.4% (1488 ± 234 kcal/day vs. 1971 ± 257 kcal/day; p 
ISSN:0261-5614
1532-1983
DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2016.05.009