Contact‐free monitoring of vessel graft stiffness – proof of concept as a tool for vascular tissue engineering

Tissue‐engineered vessel grafts have to mimic the biomechanical properties of native blood vessels. Manufacturing processes often condition grafts to adapt them to the target flow conditions. Graft stiffness is influenced by material properties and dimensions and determines graft compliance. This pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine 2017-10, Vol.11 (10), p.2828-2835
Hauptverfasser: Hoenicka, Markus, Kaspar, Marcel, Schmid, Christof, Liebold, Andreas, Schrammel, Siegfried
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Tissue‐engineered vessel grafts have to mimic the biomechanical properties of native blood vessels. Manufacturing processes often condition grafts to adapt them to the target flow conditions. Graft stiffness is influenced by material properties and dimensions and determines graft compliance. This proof‐of‐concept study evaluated a contact‐free method to monitor biomechanical properties without compromising sterility. Forced vibration response analysis was performed on human umbilical vein (HUV) segments mounted in a buffer‐filled tubing system. A linear motor and a dynamic signal analyser were used to excite the fluid by white noise (0–200 Hz). Vein responses were read out by laser triangulation and analysed by fast Fourier transformation. Modal analysis was performed by monitoring multiple positions of the vessel surface. As an inverse model of graft stiffening during conditioning, HUV were digested proteolytically, and the course of natural frequencies (NFs) was monitored over 120 min. Human umbilical vein showed up to five modes with NFs in the range of 5–100 Hz. The first natural frequencies of HUV did not alter over time while incubated in buffer (p = 0.555), whereas both collagenase (−35%, p = 0.0061) and elastase (−45%, p 
ISSN:1932-6254
1932-7005
DOI:10.1002/term.2186