Prescribing Preferences in the First-line Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in the United States
Abstract Background Despite existing guidelines for first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), prescribing preferences in the United States (US) have not been fully examined. Objectives To characterize US physicians’ preferences and factors influencing first-line mRCC treatment....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical genitourinary cancer 2016-10, Vol.14 (5), p.e479-e487 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Background Despite existing guidelines for first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), prescribing preferences in the United States (US) have not been fully examined. Objectives To characterize US physicians’ preferences and factors influencing first-line mRCC treatment. Methods A web-based study presented physicians with hypothetical mRCC patient cases and recorded initial therapy preference and rationale. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize preferred treatment; logistic regression was used to determine patient characteristics associated with therapy changes. Analyses were conducted on pooled responses across cases. Model results were summarized using odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and P -values for the covariates. Results 109 physicians participated in the study; 88.1% chose a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as their preferred first-line mRCC treatment (56.9%, sunitinib; 28.4%, pazopanib). Perceived superior overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were top reasons physicians chose sunitinib; enhanced tolerability and similar efficacy to sunitinib were top reasons physicians chose pazopanib. Initial sunitinib prescribers were more likely to change therapy in the presence of comorbid conditions (OR=2.915; P =0.0068), poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (OR=2.368; P =0.0106), or poor prognostic risk (OR=3.884; P =0.0224). This was not seen for initial pazopanib prescribers. Conclusion Sunitinib and pazopanib were the most preferred agents for first-line mRCC treatment. Sunitinib preference was driven by perceptions of efficacy, while pazopanib was preferred for its perceived tolerability and similar efficacy to sunitinib. With varying clinical scenarios, initial pazopanib prescribers were more likely to maintain pazopanib and alter dosing; sunitinib prescribers were more likely to switch therapy. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1558-7673 1938-0682 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.04.003 |