Ridge preservation of extraction sockets with chronic pathology using Bio‐Oss® Collagen with or without collagen membrane: an experimental study in dogs
Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the dynamics of newly bone formation and dimensional change in diseased extraction sockets using Bio‐Oss® Collagen with or without a collagen membrane. Material and methods In six beagle dogs, right and left 3rd and 4th mandibular premolars were hemisected and...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical oral implants research 2017-06, Vol.28 (6), p.727-733 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 733 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 727 |
| container_title | Clinical oral implants research |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | Kim, Jung‐Ju Schwarz, Frank Song, Hyun Young Choi, YoonMi Kang, Kyung‐Rim Koo, Ki‐Tae |
| description | Objectives
This study aimed to evaluate the dynamics of newly bone formation and dimensional change in diseased extraction sockets using Bio‐Oss® Collagen with or without a collagen membrane.
Material and methods
In six beagle dogs, right and left 3rd and 4th mandibular premolars were hemisected and the distal roots were removed. Combined endodontic–periodontic lesions were induced in all sites using black silk, collagen sponge, endodontic files, and application of Porphyromonas gingivalis. After 4 months, among 4 premolars, three teeth were randomly selected per dog and allocated to the following experimental groups: Control group (no treatment but debridement), Test 1 group (only Bio‐Oss® Collagen graft), and Test 2 group (Bio‐Oss® Collagen graft with a collagen membrane). After 7 months from the baseline, the beagle dogs were sacrificed for histomorphometric and Micro‐CT analysis.
Results
The vertical distance between buccal and lingual crests in the Control group (2.22 ± 0.26 mm) and Test 2 group (1.80 ± 0.16 mm) was significantly different. The socket of the Test 2 group (27.04 ± 5.25%) was occupied by a greater quantity of bone graft compared to the Test 1 group (18.49 ± 2.11%).
Conclusion
Ridge preservation in diseased extraction sockets could compensate for buccal bone resorption by contact osteogenesis surrounding the bone graft particles at the bucco‐coronal area during socket healing, and the application of a collagen membrane at the entrance of the socket is useful for preserving graft material at the coronal part of the socket. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/clr.12870 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826690344</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1920462014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-b25ef8476c606e604db9bde571bcf7890015acadcd86549dff3170c636c39c613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9u1TAQxi1ERR-FBRdAltjAIu04f5yYHTwBrfSkShWsLceZ5LkkdrAdyttxBPbcgUNwFE7S9KVlUamzGY3mN9_M6CPkBYNjNseJ7v0xS6sSHpEV4wAJFMAekxUIKJKScXZInoZwCQBcVOIJOUxLJnJWlivy-8I0HdLRY0D_XUXjLHUtxR_RK72vgtNfMQZ6ZeKW6q131mg6qrh1vet2dArGdvS9cf9-_joP4e8funZ9rzq0y4Tz--ymSPVdY8Ch9sriW6rsvGpEbwa0UfU0xKnZUWNp47rwjBy0qg_4_DYfkS8fP3xenyab809n63ebRGdFBkmdFthWeck1B44c8qYWdYNFyWrdlpUAYIXSqtFNxYtcNG2bsRI0z7jOhOYsOyKvF93Ru28ThigHEzTOx1p0U5CsSjkXkOX5jL66h166ydv5OslECjlPgd1QbxZKexeCx1aO84fK7yQDeeOYnB2Te8dm9uWt4lQP2Pwn7yyagZMFuDI97h5WkuvNxSJ5DVcApDQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1920462014</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ridge preservation of extraction sockets with chronic pathology using Bio‐Oss® Collagen with or without collagen membrane: an experimental study in dogs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kim, Jung‐Ju ; Schwarz, Frank ; Song, Hyun Young ; Choi, YoonMi ; Kang, Kyung‐Rim ; Koo, Ki‐Tae</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jung‐Ju ; Schwarz, Frank ; Song, Hyun Young ; Choi, YoonMi ; Kang, Kyung‐Rim ; Koo, Ki‐Tae</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
This study aimed to evaluate the dynamics of newly bone formation and dimensional change in diseased extraction sockets using Bio‐Oss® Collagen with or without a collagen membrane.
Material and methods
In six beagle dogs, right and left 3rd and 4th mandibular premolars were hemisected and the distal roots were removed. Combined endodontic–periodontic lesions were induced in all sites using black silk, collagen sponge, endodontic files, and application of Porphyromonas gingivalis. After 4 months, among 4 premolars, three teeth were randomly selected per dog and allocated to the following experimental groups: Control group (no treatment but debridement), Test 1 group (only Bio‐Oss® Collagen graft), and Test 2 group (Bio‐Oss® Collagen graft with a collagen membrane). After 7 months from the baseline, the beagle dogs were sacrificed for histomorphometric and Micro‐CT analysis.
Results
The vertical distance between buccal and lingual crests in the Control group (2.22 ± 0.26 mm) and Test 2 group (1.80 ± 0.16 mm) was significantly different. The socket of the Test 2 group (27.04 ± 5.25%) was occupied by a greater quantity of bone graft compared to the Test 1 group (18.49 ± 2.11%).
Conclusion
Ridge preservation in diseased extraction sockets could compensate for buccal bone resorption by contact osteogenesis surrounding the bone graft particles at the bucco‐coronal area during socket healing, and the application of a collagen membrane at the entrance of the socket is useful for preserving graft material at the coronal part of the socket.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/clr.12870</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27194177</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bacteroidaceae Infections - physiopathology ; Biocompatibility ; Biomedical materials ; Bio‐Gide ; Bio‐Oss ; Bone grafts ; Bone growth ; Bone healing ; Bone Regeneration ; Bone resorption ; Bone Substitutes ; Bones ; Chronic Disease ; Collagen ; Computed tomography ; Dental roots ; Dentistry ; Dimensional changes ; Disease Models, Animal ; Dogs ; Extraction ; Grafting ; Healing ; Inflammation ; Lesions ; Mandible ; Membranes, Artificial ; Minerals ; Osteogenesis ; Periodontics ; Porphyromonas gingivalis ; Premolars ; Preservation ; Silk ; Skin & tissue grafts ; socket graft ; Sockets ; Surgical instruments ; Teeth ; Tooth Extraction ; tooth socket ; Tooth Socket - cytology ; Tooth Socket - diagnostic imaging ; Tooth Socket - microbiology ; Tooth Socket - physiology ; Wound Healing ; X-Ray Microtomography</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral implants research, 2017-06, Vol.28 (6), p.727-733</ispartof><rights>2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-b25ef8476c606e604db9bde571bcf7890015acadcd86549dff3170c636c39c613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-b25ef8476c606e604db9bde571bcf7890015acadcd86549dff3170c636c39c613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fclr.12870$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fclr.12870$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27194177$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jung‐Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarz, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Hyun Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, YoonMi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Kyung‐Rim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koo, Ki‐Tae</creatorcontrib><title>Ridge preservation of extraction sockets with chronic pathology using Bio‐Oss® Collagen with or without collagen membrane: an experimental study in dogs</title><title>Clinical oral implants research</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><description>Objectives
This study aimed to evaluate the dynamics of newly bone formation and dimensional change in diseased extraction sockets using Bio‐Oss® Collagen with or without a collagen membrane.
Material and methods
In six beagle dogs, right and left 3rd and 4th mandibular premolars were hemisected and the distal roots were removed. Combined endodontic–periodontic lesions were induced in all sites using black silk, collagen sponge, endodontic files, and application of Porphyromonas gingivalis. After 4 months, among 4 premolars, three teeth were randomly selected per dog and allocated to the following experimental groups: Control group (no treatment but debridement), Test 1 group (only Bio‐Oss® Collagen graft), and Test 2 group (Bio‐Oss® Collagen graft with a collagen membrane). After 7 months from the baseline, the beagle dogs were sacrificed for histomorphometric and Micro‐CT analysis.
Results
The vertical distance between buccal and lingual crests in the Control group (2.22 ± 0.26 mm) and Test 2 group (1.80 ± 0.16 mm) was significantly different. The socket of the Test 2 group (27.04 ± 5.25%) was occupied by a greater quantity of bone graft compared to the Test 1 group (18.49 ± 2.11%).
Conclusion
Ridge preservation in diseased extraction sockets could compensate for buccal bone resorption by contact osteogenesis surrounding the bone graft particles at the bucco‐coronal area during socket healing, and the application of a collagen membrane at the entrance of the socket is useful for preserving graft material at the coronal part of the socket.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteroidaceae Infections - physiopathology</subject><subject>Biocompatibility</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Bio‐Gide</subject><subject>Bio‐Oss</subject><subject>Bone grafts</subject><subject>Bone growth</subject><subject>Bone healing</subject><subject>Bone Regeneration</subject><subject>Bone resorption</subject><subject>Bone Substitutes</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Collagen</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Dental roots</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dimensional changes</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Extraction</subject><subject>Grafting</subject><subject>Healing</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Mandible</subject><subject>Membranes, Artificial</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>Osteogenesis</subject><subject>Periodontics</subject><subject>Porphyromonas gingivalis</subject><subject>Premolars</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Silk</subject><subject>Skin & tissue grafts</subject><subject>socket graft</subject><subject>Sockets</subject><subject>Surgical instruments</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Tooth Extraction</subject><subject>tooth socket</subject><subject>Tooth Socket - cytology</subject><subject>Tooth Socket - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tooth Socket - microbiology</subject><subject>Tooth Socket - physiology</subject><subject>Wound Healing</subject><subject>X-Ray Microtomography</subject><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9u1TAQxi1ERR-FBRdAltjAIu04f5yYHTwBrfSkShWsLceZ5LkkdrAdyttxBPbcgUNwFE7S9KVlUamzGY3mN9_M6CPkBYNjNseJ7v0xS6sSHpEV4wAJFMAekxUIKJKScXZInoZwCQBcVOIJOUxLJnJWlivy-8I0HdLRY0D_XUXjLHUtxR_RK72vgtNfMQZ6ZeKW6q131mg6qrh1vet2dArGdvS9cf9-_joP4e8funZ9rzq0y4Tz--ymSPVdY8Ch9sriW6rsvGpEbwa0UfU0xKnZUWNp47rwjBy0qg_4_DYfkS8fP3xenyab809n63ebRGdFBkmdFthWeck1B44c8qYWdYNFyWrdlpUAYIXSqtFNxYtcNG2bsRI0z7jOhOYsOyKvF93Ru28ThigHEzTOx1p0U5CsSjkXkOX5jL66h166ydv5OslECjlPgd1QbxZKexeCx1aO84fK7yQDeeOYnB2Te8dm9uWt4lQP2Pwn7yyagZMFuDI97h5WkuvNxSJ5DVcApDQ</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>Kim, Jung‐Ju</creator><creator>Schwarz, Frank</creator><creator>Song, Hyun Young</creator><creator>Choi, YoonMi</creator><creator>Kang, Kyung‐Rim</creator><creator>Koo, Ki‐Tae</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>Ridge preservation of extraction sockets with chronic pathology using Bio‐Oss® Collagen with or without collagen membrane: an experimental study in dogs</title><author>Kim, Jung‐Ju ; Schwarz, Frank ; Song, Hyun Young ; Choi, YoonMi ; Kang, Kyung‐Rim ; Koo, Ki‐Tae</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-b25ef8476c606e604db9bde571bcf7890015acadcd86549dff3170c636c39c613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteroidaceae Infections - physiopathology</topic><topic>Biocompatibility</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Bio‐Gide</topic><topic>Bio‐Oss</topic><topic>Bone grafts</topic><topic>Bone growth</topic><topic>Bone healing</topic><topic>Bone Regeneration</topic><topic>Bone resorption</topic><topic>Bone Substitutes</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Collagen</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Dental roots</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dimensional changes</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Extraction</topic><topic>Grafting</topic><topic>Healing</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Mandible</topic><topic>Membranes, Artificial</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>Osteogenesis</topic><topic>Periodontics</topic><topic>Porphyromonas gingivalis</topic><topic>Premolars</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Silk</topic><topic>Skin & tissue grafts</topic><topic>socket graft</topic><topic>Sockets</topic><topic>Surgical instruments</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Tooth Extraction</topic><topic>tooth socket</topic><topic>Tooth Socket - cytology</topic><topic>Tooth Socket - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tooth Socket - microbiology</topic><topic>Tooth Socket - physiology</topic><topic>Wound Healing</topic><topic>X-Ray Microtomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jung‐Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarz, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Hyun Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, YoonMi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Kyung‐Rim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koo, Ki‐Tae</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Jung‐Ju</au><au>Schwarz, Frank</au><au>Song, Hyun Young</au><au>Choi, YoonMi</au><au>Kang, Kyung‐Rim</au><au>Koo, Ki‐Tae</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ridge preservation of extraction sockets with chronic pathology using Bio‐Oss® Collagen with or without collagen membrane: an experimental study in dogs</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>727</spage><epage>733</epage><pages>727-733</pages><issn>0905-7161</issn><eissn>1600-0501</eissn><abstract>Objectives
This study aimed to evaluate the dynamics of newly bone formation and dimensional change in diseased extraction sockets using Bio‐Oss® Collagen with or without a collagen membrane.
Material and methods
In six beagle dogs, right and left 3rd and 4th mandibular premolars were hemisected and the distal roots were removed. Combined endodontic–periodontic lesions were induced in all sites using black silk, collagen sponge, endodontic files, and application of Porphyromonas gingivalis. After 4 months, among 4 premolars, three teeth were randomly selected per dog and allocated to the following experimental groups: Control group (no treatment but debridement), Test 1 group (only Bio‐Oss® Collagen graft), and Test 2 group (Bio‐Oss® Collagen graft with a collagen membrane). After 7 months from the baseline, the beagle dogs were sacrificed for histomorphometric and Micro‐CT analysis.
Results
The vertical distance between buccal and lingual crests in the Control group (2.22 ± 0.26 mm) and Test 2 group (1.80 ± 0.16 mm) was significantly different. The socket of the Test 2 group (27.04 ± 5.25%) was occupied by a greater quantity of bone graft compared to the Test 1 group (18.49 ± 2.11%).
Conclusion
Ridge preservation in diseased extraction sockets could compensate for buccal bone resorption by contact osteogenesis surrounding the bone graft particles at the bucco‐coronal area during socket healing, and the application of a collagen membrane at the entrance of the socket is useful for preserving graft material at the coronal part of the socket.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>27194177</pmid><doi>10.1111/clr.12870</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0905-7161 |
| ispartof | Clinical oral implants research, 2017-06, Vol.28 (6), p.727-733 |
| issn | 0905-7161 1600-0501 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826690344 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Animals Bacteroidaceae Infections - physiopathology Biocompatibility Biomedical materials Bio‐Gide Bio‐Oss Bone grafts Bone growth Bone healing Bone Regeneration Bone resorption Bone Substitutes Bones Chronic Disease Collagen Computed tomography Dental roots Dentistry Dimensional changes Disease Models, Animal Dogs Extraction Grafting Healing Inflammation Lesions Mandible Membranes, Artificial Minerals Osteogenesis Periodontics Porphyromonas gingivalis Premolars Preservation Silk Skin & tissue grafts socket graft Sockets Surgical instruments Teeth Tooth Extraction tooth socket Tooth Socket - cytology Tooth Socket - diagnostic imaging Tooth Socket - microbiology Tooth Socket - physiology Wound Healing X-Ray Microtomography |
| title | Ridge preservation of extraction sockets with chronic pathology using Bio‐Oss® Collagen with or without collagen membrane: an experimental study in dogs |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T16%3A14%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ridge%20preservation%20of%20extraction%20sockets%20with%20chronic%20pathology%20using%20Bio%E2%80%90Oss%C2%AE%20Collagen%20with%20or%20without%20collagen%20membrane:%20an%20experimental%20study%20in%20dogs&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20implants%20research&rft.au=Kim,%20Jung%E2%80%90Ju&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=727&rft.epage=733&rft.pages=727-733&rft.issn=0905-7161&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/clr.12870&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1920462014%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1920462014&rft_id=info:pmid/27194177&rfr_iscdi=true |