Ridge preservation of extraction sockets with chronic pathology using Bio‐Oss® Collagen with or without collagen membrane: an experimental study in dogs

Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the dynamics of newly bone formation and dimensional change in diseased extraction sockets using Bio‐Oss® Collagen with or without a collagen membrane. Material and methods In six beagle dogs, right and left 3rd and 4th mandibular premolars were hemisected and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical oral implants research 2017-06, Vol.28 (6), p.727-733
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Jung‐Ju, Schwarz, Frank, Song, Hyun Young, Choi, YoonMi, Kang, Kyung‐Rim, Koo, Ki‐Tae
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the dynamics of newly bone formation and dimensional change in diseased extraction sockets using Bio‐Oss® Collagen with or without a collagen membrane. Material and methods In six beagle dogs, right and left 3rd and 4th mandibular premolars were hemisected and the distal roots were removed. Combined endodontic–periodontic lesions were induced in all sites using black silk, collagen sponge, endodontic files, and application of Porphyromonas gingivalis. After 4 months, among 4 premolars, three teeth were randomly selected per dog and allocated to the following experimental groups: Control group (no treatment but debridement), Test 1 group (only Bio‐Oss® Collagen graft), and Test 2 group (Bio‐Oss® Collagen graft with a collagen membrane). After 7 months from the baseline, the beagle dogs were sacrificed for histomorphometric and Micro‐CT analysis. Results The vertical distance between buccal and lingual crests in the Control group (2.22 ± 0.26 mm) and Test 2 group (1.80 ± 0.16 mm) was significantly different. The socket of the Test 2 group (27.04 ± 5.25%) was occupied by a greater quantity of bone graft compared to the Test 1 group (18.49 ± 2.11%). Conclusion Ridge preservation in diseased extraction sockets could compensate for buccal bone resorption by contact osteogenesis surrounding the bone graft particles at the bucco‐coronal area during socket healing, and the application of a collagen membrane at the entrance of the socket is useful for preserving graft material at the coronal part of the socket.
ISSN:0905-7161
1600-0501
DOI:10.1111/clr.12870