The Impact of the Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay on Treatment Decisions for Women With Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Node-Negative Breast Carcinoma in Hong Kong

We evaluated the impact of the Oncotype DX assay on adjuvant treatment decisions for Chinese patients with breast cancer in Hong Kong. A comparison of pre-assay and post-assay recommendations demonstrated use of the information for treatment recommendations, resulting in a 27% decrease in chemothera...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical breast cancer 2016-10, Vol.16 (5), p.372-378
Hauptverfasser: Leung, Roland C.Y., Yau, Thomas C.C., Chan, Miranda C.M., Chan, Sharon W.W., Chan, Terence W.C., Tsang, Yvonne Y.Y., Wong, Ting Ting, Chao, Calvin, Yoshizawa, Carl, Soong, Inda S., Kwan, Wing-Hong, Kwok, Carol C.H., Suen, Joyce S.J., Ngan, Roger K.C., Cheung, Polly S.Y.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We evaluated the impact of the Oncotype DX assay on adjuvant treatment decisions for Chinese patients with breast cancer in Hong Kong. A comparison of pre-assay and post-assay recommendations demonstrated use of the information for treatment recommendations, resulting in a 27% decrease in chemotherapy usage. In approximately 30% of cases, physicians in the multidisciplinary committee agree/strongly agree that the assay influenced their decision. The Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay is validated to assess risk of distant recurrence and likelihood of chemotherapy (CT) benefit in estrogen receptor-positive ESBC in various populations. In Hong Kong, > 80% of breast cancers are early stage breast cancer (ESBC) and > 60% of these women receive CT. This prospective study measured changes in CT type and recommendations, as well as physician impression of assay impact in a homogenous Chinese population. Consecutive patients with estrogen receptor-positive, T1-3 N0-1mi M0 ESBC were offered enrollment. After surgery, physicians discussed treatment options with patients, then ordered the assay, then reassessed treatment recommendation considering assay results. Changes in treatment recommendation, CT utilization, physician confidence, and physician rating of influence on their treatment recommendations were measured. A total of 146 evaluable patients received pre- and post-testing treatment recommendations. CT recommendations (including changes in intensity of CT) were changed for 34 of 146 patients (23.3%; 95% confidence interval, 16.7%-31.0%); change in intensity occurred in 7 of 146 (4.8%). There were 27 changes in treatment recommendations of adding or removing CT altogether (18.5% change; 95% confidence interval, 12.6%-25.8%). CT recommendations decreased from 52.1% to 37.7%, a net absolute reduction of 14.4% (P < .001; 27.6% net relative reduction). Pre-assay, 96% of physicians agreed/strongly agreed that they were confident in their treatment recommendation; post-assay, 90% of physicians agreed/strongly agreed with the same statement. Thirty percent of physicians agreed/strongly agreed that the test had influenced their recommendation, similar to the proportion of changed recommendations. The Oncotype DX Assay appears to influence physician ESBC adjuvant treatment recommendations in Hong Kong.
ISSN:1526-8209
1938-0666
DOI:10.1016/j.clbc.2016.03.002