Effect of laser‐activated irrigation on biofilms in artificial root canals

Aim To evaluate the antimicrobial effect of laser‐activated irrigation (LAI) on biofilms formed in simulated root canals. Methodology A dual‐species biofilm of Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus mutans was grown in a resin root canal model. Biofilms were formed over 48 h and subsequently subjec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International endodontic journal 2017-05, Vol.50 (5), p.472-479
Hauptverfasser: De Meyer, S., Meire, M. A., Coenye, T., De Moor, R. J. G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim To evaluate the antimicrobial effect of laser‐activated irrigation (LAI) on biofilms formed in simulated root canals. Methodology A dual‐species biofilm of Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus mutans was grown in a resin root canal model. Biofilms were formed over 48 h and subsequently subjected to the following treatments, all executed for 20 s: syringe irrigation (SI) with a 27G needle, ultrasonically activated irrigation (UAI) with a size 20 Irrisafe file, and LAI with a 2940 nm Er:YAG laser (20 Hz, 50 μs, 20 or 40 mJ, conical fibre tip at two positions). Tests were performed with both sterile saline as well as NaOCl (2.5%) as the irrigant. Surviving bacteria were harvested and the number of CFU was determined by plate counting and compared across groups (anova, P ≤ 0.05). Results Using saline as the irrigant, significant reductions in viable counts compared to untreated controls were observed for ultrasonically activated irrigation (0.52 log10 reduction) and for all laser‐activated irrigation groups (>1 log10 reduction), but not for syringe irrigation (2.2 log10 units) in the number of attached bacteria were observed for all treatment groups with no significant differences between laser‐activated and ultrasonically activated irrigation. Conclusions Within the limitations of this in vitro set‐up, laser‐activated irrigation removed more biofilm than ultrasonically activated irrigation when using saline as the irrigant, indicating greater physical biofilm removal. The use of NaOCl resulted in greater biofilm reduction with no significant differences between treatment groups.
ISSN:0143-2885
1365-2591
DOI:10.1111/iej.12643