Effects of dual-task balance training on postural performance in patients with Multiple Sclerosis: a double-blind, randomized controlled pilot trial
Objective: To investigate the effects of dual-task balance training on postural performance in patients with multiple sclerosis as compared with single-task balance training. Design: Double-blind, pretest-posttest, randomized controlled pilot trial. Setting: Local Multiple Sclerosis Society. Subject...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical rehabilitation 2017-02, Vol.31 (2), p.234-241 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective:
To investigate the effects of dual-task balance training on postural performance in patients with multiple sclerosis as compared with single-task balance training.
Design:
Double-blind, pretest-posttest, randomized controlled pilot trial.
Setting:
Local Multiple Sclerosis Society.
Subjects:
A total of 47 patients were randomly assigned to two equal groups labeled as single-task training and dual-task training groups.
Interventions:
All patients received supervised balance training sessions, 3 times per week for 4 weeks. The patients in the single-task group performed balance activities, alone. However, patients in dual-task group practiced balance activities while simultaneously performing cognitive tasks.
Main measures:
The 10-Meter Walk Test and Timed Up-and-Go under single-task and dual-task conditions, in addition to Activities-specific Balance Confidence, Berg Balance Scale, and Functional Gait Assessment were assessed pre-, and post intervention and also 6-weeks after the end of intervention.
Results:
Only 38 patients completed the treatment plan. There was no difference in the amount of improvement seen between the two study groups. In both groups there was a significant effect of time for dual-10 Meter Walk Test (F1, 36=11.33, p=0.002) and dual-Timed Up-and-Go (F1, 36=14.27, p=0.001) but not for their single-tasks. Moreover, there was a significant effect of time for Activities-specific Balance Confidence, Berg Balance Scale, and Functional Gait Assessment (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0269-2155 1477-0873 |
DOI: | 10.1177/0269215516639735 |