Exertional angina due to fused aortic bioprosthesis during left ventricular assist device support: two cases and review of the literature
We present the case of two patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and moderate aortic valve regurgitation that were treated with a bioprosthetic valve at the time of the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. A few months later patients revealed partial recovery in the left ven...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | ASAIO journal (1992) 2017-01, Vol.63 (1), p.e6-e9 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We present the case of two patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and moderate aortic valve regurgitation that were treated with a bioprosthetic valve at the time of the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. A few months later patients revealed partial recovery in the left ventricle systolic function. Both patients, during the LVAD turn-down protocol, reported the onset of chest pain. The transthoracic echocardiography, revealed the presence of a new transaortic pressure gradient. We confirmed the presence of a fused bioprosthetic valve by further performing a transesophageal echocardiogram and a left and right heart catheterization. Replacement of aortic valve at the time of an LVAD implantation constitutes a challenging case. Though a mechanical valve is contraindicated due to the increased thromboembolic risk, selecting a bioprosthetic valve increases the risk of valve leaflets fusion. The consequences of this phenomenon should be acknowledged in LVAD patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic, especially under the view of LVAD explantation for those revealing myocardial recovery under mechanical unloading. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1058-2916 1538-943X |
DOI: | 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000369 |