Impact of the reduction of the recommended energy target in the ICU on protein delivery and clinical outcomes

Summary Background & aims Energy targets are a matter of debate for intensive care (ICU) patients. As the guidelines have evolved, energy targets have been reduced, while the protein intake objectives have increased. The impact of these changes remains largely unknown. This quality study aimed a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) Scotland), 2017-02, Vol.36 (1), p.281-287
Hauptverfasser: Berger, M.M, Soguel, L, Charrière, M, Thériault, B, Pralong, F, Schaller, M.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Background & aims Energy targets are a matter of debate for intensive care (ICU) patients. As the guidelines have evolved, energy targets have been reduced, while the protein intake objectives have increased. The impact of these changes remains largely unknown. This quality study aimed at investigating the clinical impact of these changes in patients with an ICU stay >3 days. Methods Observational cohort study over two 3 months periods (A, B), with distinct prevailing nutrition recommendations in patients admitted consecutively to a multidisciplinary ICU. Inclusion criterion: ICU stay >3 days. Recorded variables: severity scores, energy target and delivery, protein delivery, feeding route, length of stay (ICU, hospital) and hospital outcome. Data as mean, SD and IQR. Results The analysis included 389 patients, and 3920 observation days. Except for patient age (A versus B: 57.8 and 62.3 years; p = 0.010) and NRS (4.3 vs 3.9 respectively p = 0.002), the cohorts were similar. Compared to A, the mean prescribed energy target decreased by 125 kcal (1947 kcal/d vs. 1822 kcal*day−1 respectively), resulting in lower energy delivery (1353 kcal*day−1 vs. 1238 kcal*day−1 ; p 
ISSN:0261-5614
1532-1983
DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2015.12.002