Do fewer males present to clinical high‐risk services for psychosis relative to first‐episode services?
Aim A decline in the rate of transition to psychosis in patients presenting with clinical high‐risk has been reported in the literature. Several hypotheses have been put forward to explain this decline. In this brief report, we aimed to explore whether the demographic group presenting to clinical hi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Early intervention in psychiatry 2017-10, Vol.11 (5), p.429-435 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aim
A decline in the rate of transition to psychosis in patients presenting with clinical high‐risk has been reported in the literature. Several hypotheses have been put forward to explain this decline. In this brief report, we aimed to explore whether the demographic group presenting to clinical high‐risk services differs from the ‘end‐point’ population who present with first‐episode psychosis (FEP), by focusing on gender.
Method
Gender distribution was compared between clinical high‐risk (CHR) and FEP using data extracted from published study samples and clinical data from corresponding cohorts within the same catchment area in South London.
Results
The proportion of males was significantly higher in FEP compared to CHR services in the literature describing Europe, Australia and North America and in the clinical cohort from South London.
Conclusion
Males are under‐represented in existing CHR services in Europe, Australia and North America. This could reflect less willingness in males to seek help if experiencing low‐level psychological distress and may be related to the declining transition. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1751-7885 1751-7893 |
DOI: | 10.1111/eip.12311 |