Using environmental isotopes and dissolved methane concentrations to constrain hydrochemical processes and inter-aquifer mixing in the Galilee and Eromanga Basins, Great Artesian Basin, Australia

•Regional inter-aquifer mixing is unlikely based on isotopic evidence.•Local inter-aquifer mixing occurs through faults as evidenced by dissolved methane data.•Carbonate dissolution and silicate weathering are the main hydrochemical processes.•Faults influence gas migration in coal seam gas basins....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2016-08, Vol.539, p.304-318
Hauptverfasser: Moya, Claudio E., Raiber, Matthias, Taulis, Mauricio, Cox, Malcolm E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Regional inter-aquifer mixing is unlikely based on isotopic evidence.•Local inter-aquifer mixing occurs through faults as evidenced by dissolved methane data.•Carbonate dissolution and silicate weathering are the main hydrochemical processes.•Faults influence gas migration in coal seam gas basins. Groundwater recharge processes, water–rock interaction and the hydraulic connectivity between aquifers of the Galilee and Eromanga Basins in central Queensland, Australia, were investigated using stable (δ2H, δ18O, δ13C and 87Sr/86Sr) and radiogenic (36Cl) isotopes and dissolved methane concentrations, complemented by major ion chemistry. The central Eromanga and the upper sequence of the Galilee basins are both sub-basins of the Great Artesian Basin (GAB), and the coal seams of the Galilee Basin are currently explored for their potential as commercial coal seam gas deposits. In order to understand the potential influence of depressurisation of coal seams required to release the gas on adjacent aquifers, a detailed understanding of recharge processes and groundwater hydraulics of these basins prior to any development is required. Each of the different isotope systems were used in this study to provide different information on specific processes. For example, the assessment of δ13C and 87Sr/86Sr ratios suggested that carbonate dissolution is one of the major processes controlling the water chemistry within some aquifers. In addition, the combined assessment of δ2H, δ18O and major ion chemistry indicates that transpiration is the primary process controlling the solute concentration in the GAB recharge area, whereas evaporation appears to be less significant. Groundwaters in the Galilee Basin recharge area (outside the limits of the GAB) are different to any groundwater within the GAB units. This difference is attributed to the dissolution of potassium-bearing micas, which are absent in the GAB. Groundwater age estimates based on 36Cl/Cl ratios suggest that there is a steady increase along the flow paths, and this lack of anomalous age estimates from the recharge areas to the deeper parts of the basin indicates that there is no evidence for regional inter-aquifer mixing based in isotopes only. However, dissolved methane concentrations and groundwater chemistry near faults indicates the potential mix of gas and/or water from the coal seams into the GAB groundwaters, suggesting that there may be local influence of faults as gas/water conduits.
ISSN:0022-1694
1879-2707
DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.016